Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;25(4):e335-e350.
doi: 10.3747/co.25.4042. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review

J E Cleophat  1   2   3 , H Nabi  1   3   4 , S Pelletier  1   3 , K Bouchard  1   3 , M Dorval  1   2   3   5
Affiliations
Review

What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review

J E Cleophat et al. Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Many tools have been developed for the standardized collection of cancer family history (fh). However, it remains unclear which tools have the potential to help health professionals overcome traditional barriers to collecting such histories. In this review, we describe the characteristics, validation process, and performance of existing tools and appraise the extent to which those tools can support health professionals in identifying and managing at-risk individuals.

Methods: Studies were identified through searches of the medline, embase, and Cochrane central databases from October 2015 to September 2016. Articles were included if they described a cancer fh collection tool, its use, and its validation process.

Results: Based on seventy-nine articles published between February 1978 and September 2016, 62 tools were identified. Most of the tools were paper-based and designed to be self-administered by lay individuals. One quarter of the tools could automatically produce pedigrees, provide cancer-risk assessment, and deliver evidence-based recommendations. One third of the tools were validated against a standard reference for collected fh quality and cancer-risk assessment. Only 3 tools were integrated into an electronic health records system.

Conclusions: In the present review, we found no tool with characteristics that might make it an efficient clinical support for health care providers in cancer-risk identification and management. Adequately validated tools that are connected to electronic health records are needed to encourage the systematic identification of individuals at increased risk of cancer.

Keywords: Family history; collection tools; hereditary cancers; risk assessment; screening; tools validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Frank C, Fallah M, Ji J, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. The population impact of familial cancer, a major cause of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:1899–906. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28510. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fletcher O, Houlston RS. Architecture of inherited susceptibility to common cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:353–61. doi: 10.1038/nrc2840. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dos Santos Vidal R, Hawrysh A, Walia JS, Davey S, Feilotter H. Eligibility criteria and genetic testing results from a high-risk cohort for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Southeastern Ontario. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18:362–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al. Revised Bethesda guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:261–8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM, Giardiello FM, Hampel HL, Burt RW, on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology acg clinical guideline: genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:223–62. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.435. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources