Effects of the Vertical Malocclusion Types on the Dimension of the Mandibular Condyle
- PMID: 30112501
- PMCID: PMC6007612
- DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17029
Effects of the Vertical Malocclusion Types on the Dimension of the Mandibular Condyle
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to find the relationship between mandibular condyle morphology and dental malocclusion in patients with anterior open bite, deep bite, and normal overbite.
Methods: Eighty patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients had skeletal Class II pattern. The initial panoramic radiographs of patients were digitized using a software program, and groups were compared in terms of condylar height, width, area, and perimeter. In addition, changes in the condyle surface shape were detected using the same panoramic radiographs.
Results: The mean width was 1.55±0.06 cm in the open bite group, 1.48±0.06 cm in the deep bite group, and 1.38±0.07 cm in the normal bite group. The mean height was 2.17±0.08 cm in the open bite group, 1.95±0.06 cm in the deep bite group, and 1.97±0.08 cm in the normal bite group. The mean area was 2.33±0.13 cm2 in the open bite group, 2.09±0.11 cm2 in the deep bite group, and 2.04±0.14 cm2 in the normal bite group. There was no statistical significant difference between groups in terms of condyle measurements and condyle surface shapes.
Conclusion: The results suggest that the vertical malocclusion type does not have a considerable effect on the mandibular condyle measurements and surface shapes.
Keywords: Deep bite; mandibular condyle; open bite; panoramic radiograph; temporomandibular joint.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):ZC29-ZC33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21678.9328. Epub 2017 Feb 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28384976 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of deep bite and open bite cases: normative data for condylar positions, paths and radiographic appearances.J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Mar;31(3):213-24. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01236.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15025653
-
Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular condyle in adults with various skeletal patterns.Korean J Orthod. 2023 Mar 25;53(2):67-76. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.076. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Korean J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 36806192 Free PMC article.
-
Juvenile chronic arthritis. Dentofacial morphology, growth, mandibular function and orthodontic treatment.Swed Dent J Suppl. 1995;109:1-56. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1995. PMID: 7660317 Review.
-
Relations between anterior disc displacement and maxillomandibular morphology in skeletal anterior open bite with changes to the mandibular condyle.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;58(9):1084-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 Jul 9. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32654798
Cited by
-
[Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Dec 29;53(1):109-119. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.017. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020. PMID: 33550344 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Evaluation of Articular Eminence Inclination in Normo-Divergent Subjects with Different Skeletal Classes through CBCT.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;18(11):5992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115992. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34204929 Free PMC article.
-
Cone-beam computerized tomography study of the temporomandibular joint with different vertical bone facial types in adult females with class II bone.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 2;104(18):e42214. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042214. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 40324230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ruf S, Pancherz H. Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1998;114:475–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70166-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Keeling SD, McGorray S, Wheeler TT, King GJ. Risk factors associated with temporomandibular joint sounds in children 6 to 12 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1994;105:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70122-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S, Özkan H, Küçükkeleş N. Comparison of deep bite and open bite cases: normative data for condylar positions, paths and radiographic appearances. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:213–24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01236.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen YJ, Shih TT, Wang JS, Wang HY, Shiau YY. Magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joints of patients with acquired open bite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:734–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.020. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lieberman MA, Gazit E, Fuchs C, Lilos P. Mandibular dysfunction in 10–18 year old school children as related to morphological malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb00637.x. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources