The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy
- PMID: 30113503
- PMCID: PMC6113015
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011969
The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and 3D color power Doppler ultrasound in the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).A case-control study enrolled 190 CSP patients who underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE) in combination with dilatation and curettage (D&C). The maximum diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass, uterine scar thickness, and resistance index (RI) were measured by 2D ultrasound. The lesion volume, vascular index (VI), flow index (FI), blood vessels, and blood flow index (VFI) were assessed by 3D ultrasound. The changes of these parameters before and after UAE were analyzed. Then, the patients were divided into bleeding group and control group according to the intraoperative hemorrhage during D&C to access and compare the significance of 2D and 3D parameters in intraoperative hemorrhage.The mean VI and the mean VFI were significantly reduced after embolization (P < .01). In the bleeding group, the lesion volume and diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass were significantly larger, VI and VFI were significantly higher, the uterine scar thickness was thinner, and RI was lower (P < .05). The best indicator for prediction of massive intraoperative bleeding was the VI with an area under the curve of 0.870, the best cut-off value of VI was 7.500, and the sensitivity and specificity were 88.2% and 82.4%, respectively. In comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves among 2D and 3D ultrasound parameters, the diagnostic efficacy of lesion volume was significantly higher than maximum diameter (P < .001). The diagnostic efficacy of VI was significantly higher than maximum diameter (P = .020) and RI (P = .011).UAE reduces the number of vessels and the blood flow perfusion obviously; however, it does not reduce lesion size or increases myometrial thickness. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler, especially VI, lesion volume may be helpful in predicting excessive bleeding during D&C after UAE.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Diagnostic value and efficacy evaluation value of transvaginal color doppler ultrasound parameters for uterine scar pregnancy and sub-type after cesarean section.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01405-2. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39272005 Free PMC article.
-
The value of cesarean scar diverticulum in diagnosis of adverse events during dilatation and curettage in patient with cesarean scar pregnancy.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):525-534. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15882. Epub 2024 Sep 7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39244729
-
[Cesarean scar pregnancy analysis of 42 cases].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;44(8):566-9. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 20003781 Chinese.
-
Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Nov;486:291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Clin Chim Acta. 2018. PMID: 30102898 Review.
-
Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: results of a case series and review of the literature.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.08.013. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012. PMID: 23177105 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 14;10(2):547-553. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.547. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35097080 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship of Placental Vascular Indices with Macroscopic, Histopathologic, and Intraoperative Blood Loss in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.Obstet Gynecol Int. 2022 Jun 24;2022:2830066. doi: 10.1155/2022/2830066. eCollection 2022. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2022. PMID: 35784378 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, et al. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:2589–99. - PubMed
-
- Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:415–21. - PubMed
-
- Shi JR, Qin JJ, Wang WM, et al. Clinical study on 57 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy. J Chi Obstet Gynecol 2014;49:18–21. - PubMed
-
- Moschos E, Sreenarasimhaiah S, Twicker DM. First-trimester diagnosis of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36:504–11. - PubMed
-
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:601–10. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical