Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;97(33):e11969.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011969.

The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy

Affiliations

The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy

Jie Liu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and 3D color power Doppler ultrasound in the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).A case-control study enrolled 190 CSP patients who underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE) in combination with dilatation and curettage (D&C). The maximum diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass, uterine scar thickness, and resistance index (RI) were measured by 2D ultrasound. The lesion volume, vascular index (VI), flow index (FI), blood vessels, and blood flow index (VFI) were assessed by 3D ultrasound. The changes of these parameters before and after UAE were analyzed. Then, the patients were divided into bleeding group and control group according to the intraoperative hemorrhage during D&C to access and compare the significance of 2D and 3D parameters in intraoperative hemorrhage.The mean VI and the mean VFI were significantly reduced after embolization (P < .01). In the bleeding group, the lesion volume and diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass were significantly larger, VI and VFI were significantly higher, the uterine scar thickness was thinner, and RI was lower (P < .05). The best indicator for prediction of massive intraoperative bleeding was the VI with an area under the curve of 0.870, the best cut-off value of VI was 7.500, and the sensitivity and specificity were 88.2% and 82.4%, respectively. In comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves among 2D and 3D ultrasound parameters, the diagnostic efficacy of lesion volume was significantly higher than maximum diameter (P < .001). The diagnostic efficacy of VI was significantly higher than maximum diameter (P = .020) and RI (P = .011).UAE reduces the number of vessels and the blood flow perfusion obviously; however, it does not reduce lesion size or increases myometrial thickness. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler, especially VI, lesion volume may be helpful in predicting excessive bleeding during D&C after UAE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transvaginal 2-dimensional color ultrasound image of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Virtual organ computer-aided analysis of lesion volume. Tracing the outer edge of the lesion, including the hyperechoic region which representing villus tissue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three-dimensional power Doppler flow indices of cesarean scar pregnancy. The outer boundaries of the vascular “ring” were traced.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve illustrates ultrasound parameter values in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy patients who underwent dilatation and curettage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, et al. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:2589–99. - PubMed
    1. Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:415–21. - PubMed
    1. Shi JR, Qin JJ, Wang WM, et al. Clinical study on 57 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy. J Chi Obstet Gynecol 2014;49:18–21. - PubMed
    1. Moschos E, Sreenarasimhaiah S, Twicker DM. First-trimester diagnosis of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36:504–11. - PubMed
    1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:601–10. - PubMed

MeSH terms