Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization's Recommendation
- PMID: 30116268
- PMCID: PMC6079324
- DOI: 10.1155/2018/6764258
Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization's Recommendation
Abstract
Objective: Caesarean section (CS) rates vary significantly worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a maximum CS rate of 15%. Norwegian hospitals are paid per CS (activity-based funding), employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. We aimed to document how financial incentives can be affected by reduced CS rates, according to the WHO's recommendation.
Methods: We employed a model-based analysis and included the 2016 data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). The vaginal birth rate and CS rates of each hospital trust in Northern Norway were analyzed.
Results: There were 4,860 deliveries and a 17.5% CS rate (range 13.9-20.3%). The total funding of the deliveries was €16,351,335 (CS: €6,389,323; vaginal births: €9,962,012). The CS rate varied significantly and was lower in the southern region (P < 0.002). Consequently, the introduction of a cutoff at a 15% CS rate would gain the two southern hospital trusts by a budget increase of 0.2%. The two northern ones would experience 6.4% less resources. A total of €644,655 could be allocated to further quality and safety initiatives in obstetrics.
Conclusion: The economic consequences of the model-based financial incentive were low, but probably sufficient to get the necessary attention and influence on the CS rate.
Recommendations: A financial incentive for the reduction of CS rates should be tested as a supplement to other instruments.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validation of data in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway on delivery after a previous cesarean section.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jul;96(7):892-897. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13115. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017. PMID: 28196281
-
Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway.BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 1;13(2):e069562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069562. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36725101 Free PMC article.
-
A study comparing the WHO C-Model caesarean section rates and observed caesarean section rates at Port Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;63(3):328-334. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13621. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023. PMID: 36303291
-
An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience.Eur J Public Health. 2005 Jun;15(3):288-95. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki002. Epub 2005 May 27. Eur J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15923214
-
The effectiveness of financial intervention strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7265-4. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31399068 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The effect of virtual reality on anxiety, stress, and hemodynamic parameters during cesarean section: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Saudi Med J. 2022 Apr;43(4):360-369. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.4.20210921. Saudi Med J. 2022. PMID: 35414614 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Trend of Cesarean Section Rates and Correlations with Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of Thai Universal Coverage Scheme Data.AJP Rep. 2019 Oct;9(4):e328-e336. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697656. Epub 2019 Oct 30. AJP Rep. 2019. PMID: 31673478 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources