Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 10:2018:7365715.
doi: 10.1155/2018/7365715. eCollection 2018.

Female Genital Mutilation: Health Consequences and Complications-A Short Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Female Genital Mutilation: Health Consequences and Complications-A Short Literature Review

Elliot Klein et al. Obstet Gynecol Int. .

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a procedure performed on women in developing countries and is underreported; it involves cutting or altering the female genitalia. The health consequences of FGM include bacterial and viral infections, obstetrical complications, and psychological problems. In this study, we report FGM societal importance, ramifications, classifications, cultural significance, prevalence, complications, implications, and treatment. Although efforts have been made to eradicate FGM, the dynamics that perpetuate the practice have societal roots. Intervention methods to promote change from within the community are necessary for successful eradication of the practice. For prevention, further studies are needed to develop programs that raise awareness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FGM 10-year prevalence trends. Data collected by the PRB showing prevalence rates over a 10-year period (2000–2010) in four countries (Mali, Burkina Faso, Egypt, and Central African Republic).
Figure 2
Figure 2
FGM prevalence among young women in 2014 exhibits decline. Data collected by the PRB in 2014 in younger women showing the prevalence of FGM among younger women (aged 15–19) in four countries (Mali, Burkina Faso, Egypt, and Central African Republic).

References

    1. Yirga W. S., Kassa N. A., Gebremichael M. A., Aro A. R. Female genital mutilation: prevalence, perceptions and effect on women’s health in Kersa district of Ethiopia. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2012;4:45–54. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s28805. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donohoe M. Female Genital Cutting: Epidemiology, Consequences, and Female Empowerment. 2006. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/546497.
    1. Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2014;4(1) doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shamseer L., Moher D., Clarke M., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.g7647 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Female Genital Mutilation. 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/

LinkOut - more resources