Impact of Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis on Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass

Abstract

Background: This study compared clinical outcomes between the use of in situ and free internal thoracic artery grafts in patients with upper extremity arteriovenous fistula who underwent coronary artery bypass.

Methods: We reviewed 85 hemodialysis-dependent patients with upper extremity arteriovenous fistula who underwent coronary artery bypass with internal thoracic artery grafts. The patients were categorized into 2 groups; 48 (56%) with in situ graft ipsilateral to the arteriovenous fistula (group I) and 37 (44%) with free grafts anastomosed to the ascending aorta (group F). The follow-up period was 32.0 ± 38.1 months.

Results: The estimated overall survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 89.5%, 81.6%, and 53%, respectively, for all discharged patients. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, and freedom from major adverse cardiac events between the groups, although cardiac-related deaths occurred only in group I (n = 5). Ipsilateral in situ grafts were associated with hemodialysis-induced chest pain (odds ratio, 5.528; 95% confidence interval, 1.079 to 28.333; p = 0.040). The incidence of dialysis-induced chest pain in patients with in situ noncomposite, in situ composite, and free grafts was 45.5%, 19.4%, and 5.7%, respectively (p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Mortality was not influenced by using the internal thoracic artery as an ipsilateral in situ graft in patients with upper extremity arteriovenous fistula. However, there was a risk of increased incidence of hemodialysis-induced chest pain that is most likely related to coronary steal. A free internal thoracic artery graft would be an alternative option in these patients.