Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-suspected diarrhea in a French university hospital
- PMID: 30120646
- DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3348-x
Outcomes of Clostridium difficile-suspected diarrhea in a French university hospital
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) produces a variety of clinical presentations ranging from mild diarrhea to severe infection with fulminant colitis, septic shock, and death. CDI puts a heavy burden on healthcare systems due to increased morbidity and mortality, and higher costs. We evaluated the clinical impact of CDI in terms of complications and mortality in a French university hospital compared with patients with diarrhea unrelated to CDI. A 3-year prospective, observational, cohort study was conducted in a French university hospital. Inpatients aged 18 years or older with CDI-suspected diarrhea were eligible to participate in the study and were followed for up to 60 days after CDI testing. Among the 945 patients with diarrhea included, 233 had confirmed CDI. Overall, 106 patients (11.2%) developed at least one of the following complications: colectomy, colitis, ileitis/rectitis, ileus, intestinal perforation, megacolon, multiorgan failure, pancolitis, peritonitis, pseudomembranous colitis, renal failure, and sepsis/septic shock. The complication rate was significantly higher in patients with diarrhea related to C. difficile than in non-CDI patients (26.6% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001). At day 60, 137 (14.5%) patients had died, with 37 deaths among the CDI group (15.9%). Death was attributable to CDI in 15 patients (6.4%). Complications are more frequent among CDI cases than in patients with diarrhea not related to C. difficile. Assessment of CDI is necessary to ensure allocation of sufficient resources to CDI prevention.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile infection; Complication; Prognosis; Recurrence; Ribotype.
References
-
- Martin M, Zingg W, Knoll E, Wilson C, Dettenkofer M, Group PS (2014) National European guidelines for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic qualitative review. J Hosp Infect 87(4):212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2014.05.002 - DOI
-
- Feuerstadt P, Das R, Brandt LJ (2014) The evolution of Urban C. difficile infection (CDI): CDI in 2009–2011 is less severe and has better outcomes than CDI in 2006–2008. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1265–1276 - DOI
-
- Kim J, Kang JO, Kim H, Seo MR, Choi TY, Pai H, Kuijper EJ, Sanders I, Fawley W (2013) Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections in a tertiary-care hospital in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect 19(6):521–527 - DOI
-
- Muto CA, Blank MK, Marsh JW, Vergis EN, O’Leary MM, Shutt KA, Pasculle AW, Pokrywka M, Garcia JG, Posey K, Roberts TL, Potoski BA, Blank GE, Simmons RL, Veldkamp P, Harrison LH, Paterson DL (2007) Control of an outbreak of infection with the hypervirulent Clostridium difficile BI strain in a university hospital using a comprehensive “bundle” approach. Clin Infect Dis 45(10):1266–1273. https://doi.org/10.1086/522654 - DOI
-
- Lo Vecchio A, Zacur GM (2011) Clostridium difficile infection: an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and therapeutic options. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28(1):1–9 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

