Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;21(6):1085-1094.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12805. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

A cross-sectional survey of mental health service users', carers' and professionals' priorities for patient safety in the United Kingdom

Kathryn Berzins  1 , John Baker  1 , Mark Brown  2 , Rebecca Lawton  3
Affiliations

A cross-sectional survey of mental health service users', carers' and professionals' priorities for patient safety in the United Kingdom

Kathryn Berzins et al. Health Expect. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Establishing patient safety priorities in psychiatry has received less international attention than in other areas of health care. This study aimed to identify safety issues as described by people in the United Kingdom identifying as mental health service users, carers and professionals.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed via social media. Identified safety issues were mapped onto the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF) which categorizes factors that contribute to patient safety incidents in general hospital settings. Service user and carer responses were described separately from professional responses using descriptive statistics.

Results: One hundred and eighty-five responses from 95 service users and carers and 90 professionals were analysed. Seventy different safety issues were identified. These were mapped onto the 17 existing categories of the YCFF and two additional categories created to form the YCFF-MH. Most frequently identified issues were as follows: "Individual characteristics" (of staff) which included competence and listening skills; "Service process" that contained concerns about waiting times; "Management of staff and staffing levels" dominated by staffing levels; and "External policy context" which included the overall resourcing of services. Professionals identified staffing levels and inadequate community provision more frequently than service users and carers, who in turn identified crisis care more frequently.

Conclusions: This study updates knowledge on stakeholder perceived safety issues across mental health care. It shows a far broader range of issues relating to safety than has previously been described. The YCFF was successfully modified to describe these issues and areas for further coproduced research are suggested.

Keywords: attitude of health personnel; caregivers; health services research; inpatients; mental health services; patient safety; surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of responses by YCCF‐MH category
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . World Alliance for Patient Safety Progress Report 2006‐2007. 2008.
    1. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:365‐368. - PubMed
    1. Lawton R, McEachan RR, Giles SJ, Sirriyeh R, Watt IS, Wright J. Development of an evidence‐based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:369‐380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernan AL, Giles SJ, Fuller J, Johnson JK, Walker C, Dunbar JA. Patient and carer identified factors which contribute to safety incidents in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:583‐593. - PubMed

Publication types