Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Nir Haya  1 , Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann-Schmid, Christopher Maher
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Nir Haya et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects as many as 50% of parous women, with 14% to 19% of women undergoing a surgical correction. Although surgery for the treatment of POP is common, limited supportive data can be found in the literature regarding the preoperative and postoperative interventions related to these procedures. The main goal of perioperative interventions is to reduce the rate of adverse events while improving women's outcomes following surgical intervention for prolapse. A broad spectrum of perioperative interventions are available, and although the benefits of interventions such as prophylactic antibiotics before abdominal surgery are well established, others are unique to women undergoing POP surgeries and as such need to be investigated separately.

Objectives: The aim of this review is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a range of perioperative interventions versus other interventions or no intervention (control group) at the time of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 30 November 2017), and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted researchers in the field.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse that compared a perioperative intervention related to pelvic organ prolapse surgery versus no treatment or another intervention.

Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were objective failure at any site and subjective postoperative prolapse symptoms. We also measured adverse effects, focusing on intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion, intraoperative ureteral injury, and postoperative urinary tract infection.

Main results: We included 15 RCTs that compared eight different interventions versus no treatment for 1992 women in five countries. Most interventions were assessed by only one RCT with evidence quality ranging from very low to moderate. The main limitation was imprecision, associated with small sample sizes and low event rates.Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with no treatment (three RCTs) - peri-operative intervention The simplest of the PFMT programmes required women to attend six perioperative consultations in the three months surrounding prolapse surgery. Trial results provided no clear evidence of a difference between groups in objective failure at any site at 12 to 24 months (odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.54; two RCTs, 327 women; moderate-quality evidence). With respect to awareness of prolapse, findings were inconsistent. One RCT found no evidence of a difference between groups at 24 months (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87; one RCT, 305 women; low-quality evidence), and a second small RCT reported symptom reduction from the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Questionnaire completed by the intervention group at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -3.90, 95% CI -6.11 to -1.69; one RCT, 27 women; low-quality evidence). Researchers found no clear differences between groups at 24-month follow-up in rates of repeat surgery (or pessary) for prolapse (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.74 to 5.02; one RCT, 316 women; low-quality evidence).Other interventionsSingle RCTs evaluated the following interventions: preoperative guided imagery (N = 44); injection of vasoconstrictor agent at commencement of vaginal prolapse surgery (N = 76); ureteral stent placement during uterosacral ligament suspension (N = 91); vaginal pack (N = 116); prophylactic antibiotics for women requiring postoperative urinary catheterisation (N = 159); and postoperative vaginal dilators (N = 60).Two RCTs evaluated bowel preparation (N = 298), and four RCTs assessed the method and timing of postoperative catheterisation (N = 514) - all in different comparisons.None of these studies reported our primary review outcomes. One study reported intraoperative blood loss and suggested that vaginal injection of vasoconstrictors at commencement of surgery may reduce blood loss by a mean of about 30 mL. Another study reported intraoperative ureteral injury and found no clear evidence that ureteral stent placement reduces ureteral injury. Three RCTs reported postoperative urinary tract infection and found no conclusive evidence that rates of urinary tract infection were influenced by use of a vaginal pack, prophylactic antibiotics, or vaginal dilators. Other studies did not report these outcomes.

Authors' conclusions: There was a paucity of data about perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. A structured programme of pelvic floor muscle training before and after prolapse surgery did not consistently demonstrate any benefit for the intervention; however, this finding is based on the results of two small studies. With regard to other interventions (preoperative bowel preparation and injection of vasoconstrictor agent, ureteral stent placement during uterosacral ligament suspension, postoperative vaginal pack insertion, use of vaginal dilators, prophylactic antibiotics for postoperative catheter care), we found no evidence regarding rates of recurrent prolapse and no clear evidence that these interventions were associated with clinically meaningful reductions in adverse effects, such as intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, intraoperative ureteral injury, or postoperative urinary tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nir Haya: no known conflict of interest.

Christopher Maher: no known conflict of interest.

Kaven Baessler: no known conflict of interest.

Corina Christmann‐Schmid: no known conflict of interest.

Benjamin Feiner: no known conflict of interest.

Figures

1
1
PRISMA study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Infiltration of vasoconstrictor agent at commencement of vaginal prolapse surgery, outcome: 2.2 Blood pressure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

References to studies included in this review

Adelowo 2017 {published data only}
    1. Adelowo A, Hacker MR, Modest AM, Apostolis CA, Disciullo AJ, Hanaway KJ, et al. The use of mechanical bowel preparation in pelvic reconstructive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery 2017;23(1):1‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Antosh 2013 {published data only}
    1. Antosh D, Gutman RE, Park AJ, Sokol AI, Peterson JL, Kingsberg SA, et al. Vaginal dilators for prevention of dyspareunia after prolapse surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2013;121:1273‐80. - PubMed
Ballard 2014 {published data only}
    1. Ballard A, Parker‐Autry C, Lin CP, Markland AD, Ellington DR, Richter HE. Postoperative bowel function, symptoms and habits in women after vaginal reconstructive surgery. International Urogynecology Journal 2015;26:817‐21. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2634-8] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballard AC, Parker‐Autry C, Markland AD, Varner E, Huisingh C, Richter HE. Bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014;123(2):232‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Barber 2014 {published data only}
    1. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomised trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2014;311(10):1023‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Billquist 2017 {published data only}
    1. Billquist EJ, Michelfelder A, Brincat C, Brubaker L, Fitzgerald CM, Mueller ER. Pre‐operative guided imagery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. International Urogynecology Journal 2018;29(8):1117‐1122. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3443-z] - DOI - PubMed
Bray 2017 {published data only}
    1. Bray R, Cartwright R, Digesu A, Fernando R, Khullar V. A randomised controlled trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following vaginal prolapse surgery. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2017;210:314‐8. [DOI: ; PUBMED: 28113069] - PubMed
Chan 2014 {published data only}
    1. Chan RC, Fletcher S, Antosh D, Khavary R, Stewart J, Chen J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic ureteral stent placement during uterosacral ligament suspension. International Urogynecology Journal 2014;26:S30‐1.
Dieter 2014 {published data only}
    1. Dieter AA, Amundsen CL, Edenfield AL, Kawasaki A, Levin PJ, Visco AG, et al. Oral antibiotics to prevent postoperative urinary tract infection. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014;123(1):96‐103. [DOI: 10.097/AOG.000000000000024] - DOI - PubMed
Hakvoort 2011 {published data only}
    1. Hakvoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, Broekman AM, Ruhe IM, Vernooij MM, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2011;118(9):1055‐60. - PubMed
Henn 2016 {published data only}
    1. Henn EW, Nondabula T, Juul DL. Effect of vaginal infiltration with ornipressin or saline on intraoperative blood loss during vaginal prolapse surgery: a randomised controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal 2016;27(3):407‐12. - PubMed
Kamilya 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kamilya G, Lall Seal S, Mukherji J, Bhattacharyya SK, Hazra A. A randomized controlled trial comparing short‐ versus long‐term catheterization after uncomplicated vaginal prolapse surgery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2010;36(1):154‐8. - PubMed
McClurg 2014 {published data only}
    1. McClurg D, Hilton P, Mnga A, Hagen S, Frawley H, Dickinson L. Pelvic floor muscle training as an adjunct to prolapse surgery: a randomised feasibility study. International Urogynaecology Journal 2014;25:883‐91. - PMC - PubMed
Pauls 2013 {published data only}
    1. Pauls RN, Crisp CC, Novicki K, Fellner AN, Kleeman SD. Impact of physical therapy on quality of life and function after vaginal reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Medicine Reconstructive Surgery 2013;19(5):271‐7. - PubMed
Thiagamoorthy 2014 {published data only}
    1. Thiagamoorthy G, Khalil A, Cardozo L, Srikrishna S, Leslie G, Robinson D. The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double‐blind study. International Urogynecology Journal 2014;25(5):585‐91. - PubMed
Weemhoff 2010 {published data only}
    1. Weemhoff M, Wassen MMLH, Korsten L, Serroyen J, Kampschöer PHNM, Roumen FJME. Postoperative catheterization after anterior colporrhaphy: 2 versus 5 days. A multi‐centre randomised controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal 2010;22:477‐83. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bernades 2012 {published data only}
    1. Bernardes BT, Magalhães Resende AP, Stüpp L, Oliveira E, Castro RA, Ilona Z, et al. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training and hypopressive exercises for treating pelvic organ prolapse in women: randomised controlled trial. Sao Paulo Medical Journal 2012;130(1):5‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Butler 2017 {published data only}
    1. Butler K, Yi J, Wasson M, Klauschie J, Ryan D, Hentz J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of postoperative belladonna and opium rectal suppositories in vaginal surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2017;216(5):491. - PubMed
Crisp 2012 {published data only}
    1. Crisp CC, Bandi S, Kleeman SD, Oakley SH, Vaccaro CM, Estanol MV, et al. Patient‐controlled versus scheduled, nurse‐administered analgesia following vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomised trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012;207(5):433‐6. - PubMed
Frawley 2010 {published data only}
    1. Frawley HC, Phillips BA, Bø K, Galea MP. Physiotherapy as an adjunct to prolapse surgery: an assessor‐blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2010;29(5):719‐25. - PubMed
Glavind 2007 {published data only}
    1. Glavind K, Morup L, Madsen H, Glavind J. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2007;86(9):1122‐5. - PubMed
Gungor 2014 {published data only}
    1. Gungor UF, Yasa C, Comba C, Dural O, Ayvacikli G, Yalcin O. Effect of duration of bladder catheterization on bladder function in patients undergoing anterior colporrhaphy: prospective randomized study. International Continence Society 2014;Session 769.
Jabalameli 2012 {published data only}
    1. Jabalameli M, Abedi M, Rouholamin S, Koushki AM. Preventive effects of pudendal nerve block on postoperative pain in anterior and posterior vaginal repair. Journal of Isfahan Medical School 2012;30(208):1559‐69.
Jarvis 2005 {published data only}
    1. Jarvis SK, Hallam TK, Lujic S, Abbott JA, Vancaillie TG. Peri‐operative physiotherapy improves outcomes for women undergoing incontinence and or prolapse surgery: results of a randomised controlled trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005;45(4):300‐3. - PubMed
Karp 2012 {published data only}
    1. Karp DR, Jean‐Michel M, Johnston Y, Suciu G, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. A randomised clinical trial of the impact of local oestrogen on postoperative tissue quality after vaginal reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2012;18(4):211‐5. - PubMed
Pauls 2015 {published data only}
    1. Pauls RN, Crisp CC, Oakley SH, Westermann LB, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman SD, et al. Effects of dexamethasone on quality of recovery following vaginal surgery: a randomized trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;213:718.e1‐7. - PubMed
Zhu 2014 {published data only}
    1. Zhu L, Sun Z. Could vaginal estrogen application prior to surgery reduce mesh exposure in transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction with mesh? A 2‐year randomized controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal 2014;25:S52.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Calderon 2015 {published data only}
    1. Calderon‐Lara SA, Morgan‐Ortiz F, Trapero‐Corona IM, Trapero‐Morales M. Operative morbidity in patients undergoing hydrodissection with epinephrine during surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2015;22(6 Suppl 1):S243. - PubMed
Crisp 2017 {published data only}
    1. Crisp CC, Khan M, Lambers DL, Westermann LB, Mazloomdoost DM, Yeung JJ, et al. The effect of intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative pain and narcotic consumption after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled trial. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2017;23(2):80‐5. - PubMed
Letko 2014 {published data only}
    1. Letko J, Jirschele KE, Zhou Y, Gafni‐Kane A, Goldberg R, Vu AM. Short‐term use of cyclobenzaprine in patients undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery: randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2014;20:S291‐2.

Additional references

Brink 1994
    1. Brink CA, Wells TJ, Sampselle CM, Taillie ER, Mayer R. A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence. Nurse Research 1994;43:352‐6. - PubMed
Brubaker 2002
    1. Brubaker L, Bump R, Jacquetin B, Schuessler B, Weidner A, Zimmern P, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse. Incontinence: 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. 2nd Edition. Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd, 2002:243‐65.
Bump 1998
    1. Bump R, Norton P. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 1998;25(4):723‐46. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Ellerkmann 2001
    1. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001;185(6):1332‐7. [PUBMED: 11744905] - PubMed
FitzGerald 2007
    1. FitzGerald MP, Burgio KL, Borello‐France DF, Menefee SA, Schaffer J, Kraus S, et al. Pelvic‐floor strength in women with incontinence as assessed by the Brink scale. Physical Therapy 2007;87:1316–24. - PubMed
Gill 1998
    1. Gill EJ, Hurt WG. Pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 1998;25(4):759‐69. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
GRADEproGDT 2015 [Computer program]
    1. GRADE Working Group, McMaster University. GRADEproGDT. Version accessed 1 November 2017. Hamilton (ON): GRADE Working Group, McMaster University, 2015. Available at gradepro.org.
Güenaga 2011
    1. Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille‐Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Hagen 2009
    1. Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score. BJOG 2009;116(1):25‐31. [PUBMED: 18947342] - PubMed
Handa 2004
    1. Handa VL, Garrett E, Hendrix S, Gold E, Robbins J. Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: a longitudinal study of menopausal women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;190(1):27‐32. - PubMed
Haya 2015
    1. Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann‐Schmid C, deTayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;212(6):755.e1‐27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.017] - DOI - PubMed
Hendrix 2002
    1. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;186(6):1160‐6. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Lensen 2011
    1. Lensen EJM, Stoutjesdijk JA, Withagen MIJ, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME. Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation. International Urogynecology Journal 2011;22:557‐61. [DOI 10.1007/s00192‐010‐1353‐4] - PMC - PubMed
MacLennan 2000
    1. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000;107(12):1460‐70. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Miettinen 2000
    1. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Mäkelä JT, Pääkkönen ME. Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2000;43(5):669‐75. [PUBMED: 10826429] - PubMed
Muzil 2003
    1. Muzii L, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Calcagno M, Panici PB. Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 2003;48:311‐5. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Rogers 2003
    1. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer‐Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ‐12). International Urogynecology Journal 2003;14:164–8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2] - DOI - PubMed
Weber 2000
    1. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;182(6):1610‐5. [DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.107436] - DOI - PubMed
Yang 2011
    1. Yang LC, Arden D, Lee TT, Mansuria SM, Broach AN, D'Ambrosio L, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation for gynecologic laparoscopy: a prospective randomized trial of oral sodium phosphate solution vs single sodium phosphate enema. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2011;1(18):149–56. [PUBMED: 21167795] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Maher 2004
    1. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Maher 2007
    1. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Maher 2010
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CMA. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4] - DOI - PubMed
Maher 2013
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances