Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Aug 1:11:43.
doi: 10.1186/s13039-018-0390-4. eCollection 2018.

Monosomy chromosome 21 compensated by 21q22.11q22.3 duplication in a case with small size and minor anomalies

Affiliations
Case Reports

Monosomy chromosome 21 compensated by 21q22.11q22.3 duplication in a case with small size and minor anomalies

Meng Su et al. Mol Cytogenet. .

Abstract

Background: Partial monosomy 21 is a rare finding with variable sizes and deletion breakpoints, presenting with a broad spectrum of phenotypes.

Case presentation: We report a 10-month-old boy with short stature, minor anomalies and mild motor delay. The patient had a monosomy 21 and duplication of the 21q22.11q22.3 region on the remaining derivative chromosome 21 which represents a partial 21q uniparental disomy of paternal origin, upd(21q22.11q22.3)pat. The abnormalities were characterized by karyotyping, FISH, chromosomal microarray, and genotyping.

Conclusions: This is the first case showing a monosomy 21 compensated by upd(21q22.11q22.3) as a mechanism of genomic rescue. Because there is no strong evidence showing imprinting on chromosome 21, the uniparental disomy itself is not associated with abnormal phenotype but has reduced phenotype severity of monosomy 21. We reviewed the previously published cases with isolated 21q deletions and identified a common deletion of 5.7 Mb associated with low birth weight, length and head circumference in the 21q21.2 region.

Keywords: Chromosome 21; Deletion; Duplication; Partial monosomy; Partial uniparental disomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Our institution does not consider a clinical report as human subjects research and this falls in the realm of routine clinical care. Therefore, an IRB approval is not required for a clinical report. Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the parents of the child. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical presentation and molecular cytogenetics analysis of the present patient. a Clinical presentation of the patient at 8 months of age. He had minor facial dysmorphic features including a broad, prominent forehead, mildly depressed nasal bridge, thin upper lip, small chin, and boarder-line low set ears. b-d Cytogenetic analysis identified a deletion and an AOH resulted by duplication in chromosome 21. b CGH and SNP array profile of chromosome 21. The numbers in the CGH pane are indicating log2 ratio of the intensity of fluorescence of the patient versus control genome. In the SNP pane, the numbers indicate the number of B allele. c Karyotype of the patient. d FISH analysis in both metaphase and interphase cells using probes designed for testing presence or absence of the 21q22.11q22.3 region (red). e Genotyping by Sanger sequencing indicating the paternal origin of the derivative chromosome 21. SNPs rs2776109 and rs68172960 (shown in red) are located in the 21q11.2q21.3 region, and rs6517210 and rs9968008 (shown in blue) covered the 21q22.11q22.3 UPD region. f Genomic location of the 21q deletions in the present patient and previously published cases. The red bar indicates the 15.98 Mb deletion at 21q11.2q21.3 (chr21:15,143,552_31,118,908, GRCh37/hg19) in our patient. The black bars represent the deletion regions of previously reported cases with isolated deletion at 21q overlapping with our patient, without any other chromosomal structural abnormality. Genomic locations are showed by UCSC genome browser

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schinzel A. Letter: Does full monosomy 21 exist? A comment to the paper: A male infant with monosomy 21 by Y. Kaneko, T. Ikeuchi, M. Sasaki, Y. Satake and S. Kuwajima Humangenetik 29, 1–7 (1975) Hum Genet. 1976;32(1):105–107. doi: 10.1007/BF00569984. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah MG, Franco A, Wills KM, Kulharya AS, Buckler BS, Bhatia JJS. A rare case of complete monosomy 21 with multiple osseous, cardiac, and vascular anomalies. Eur J Radiol Extra. 2010;76:e65–e68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrex.2010.08.006. - DOI
    1. Burgess T, Downie L, Pertile MD, Francis D, Glass M, Nouri S. Monosomy 21 seen in live born is unlikely to represent true monosomy 21: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Genet. 2014;2014:965401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iqbal MA, Ahmed MZ, Wu D, Sakati N. A case of presumptive monosomy 21 re-diagnosed as unbalanced t(5p;21q) by FISH and review of literature. Am J Med Genet. 1997;70(2):174–178. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970516)70:2<174::AID-AJMG14>3.0.CO;2-G. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gill P, Uhrich S, Disteche C, Cheng E. Fetal t(5p;21q) misdiagnosed as monosomy 21: a plea for in situ hybridization studies. Am J Med Genet. 1994;52(4):416–418. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320520405. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources