Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 27:12:164-174.
doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010164. eCollection 2018.

Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Iben Bach Damgaard  1 , Mohamed Reffat  2 , Jesper Hjortdal  1
Affiliations
Review

Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Iben Bach Damgaard et al. Open Ophthalmol J. .

Abstract

Worldwide, femtosecond Laser Assisted In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) is a well known and commonly used refractive technique, although Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) has become increasingly popular since it was introduced in 2011. In LASIK, a corneal flap is cut with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser, followed by thinning of the stromal bed with excimer laser ablation. In SMILE, a minor intrastromal lenticule is cut with a femtosecond laser and subsequently removed through a small incision, leaving the anterior and strongest part of the cornea almost intact. Both LASIK and SMILE require cutting of corneal lamellae that may reduce the biomechanical stability of the cornea, with the potential risk of corneal iatrogenic ectasia as a severe complication. However, SMILE preserves the anterior corneal integrity and may, in theory, better preserve the corneal biomechanical strength than LASIK after surgery. A review aimed to examine the current literature that describes and compares the corneal biomechanical properties after Laser Assisted In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed.gov using the following search queries: Corneal biomechanical properties, corneal biomechanics, ocular response analyser, ocular response analyzer, ORA, ex vivo, in vitro, Corvis, Corvis ST, LASIK, and SMILE.

Keywords: Corvis; Corvist ST; LASIK; Myopia; Myopia astigmatism; SMILE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Solomon K.D., Fernández de Castro L.E., Sandoval H.P., Biber J.M., Groat B., Neff K.D., Ying M.S., French J.W., Donnenfeld E.D., Lindstrom R.L., Joint LASIK Study Task Force LASIK world literature review: Quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):691–701. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sekundo W., Kunert K.S., Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: Results of a 6 month prospective study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):335–339. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.174284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah R., Shah S., Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2011;37(1):127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ivarsen A., Asp S., Hjortdal J. Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(4):822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ganesh S., Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J. Refract. Surg. 2014;30(9):590–596. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources