Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):164-168.
doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_2_18.

Effect of Lidocaine on Olfactory Perception in Humans

Churunal Hari  1 , Ben Grimshaw  1 , Tim Jacob  1
Affiliations

Effect of Lidocaine on Olfactory Perception in Humans

Churunal Hari et al. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The effect of local anesthesia to the nasal mucosa on olfactory acuity is the subject of some debate. This study was aimed to investigate the effect of local anesthesia on olfactory perception.

Materials and methods: Six healthy participants, five males and one female, were chosen from the academic population of Cardiff University. Olfactory perception was monitored at intervals following administration of 4% lidocaine to the nasal mucosa in the volunteers. Lidocaine was administered using a nasal spray as used in routine otolaryngological investigations. The olfactory stimulus (amyl acetate) was delivered directly to the nostril using an olfactometer. Olfactory perception was determined by the use of a 13 trial, forced choice scoring task.

Results: Lidocaine caused a small, transient reduction in olfactory perception. The maximum reduction in olfactory perception (35%) was achieved by 60 mg lidocaine 15 min following administration, but perception could be increased to almost normal levels by increasing the odor stimulus dose. Detection of the lowest stimulus strength returned to normal levels after 30 min.

Conclusions: Intranasal application of lidocaine, caused a reduction in olfactory perception, however, did not abolish the olfactory function 15 min following administration. Physiological/psychometric olfactory testing would not be precluded under these circumstances, and the effects of anesthesia could be overcome by increasing the stimulus strength.

Keywords: Lidocaine; local anesthesia; olfaction; olfactory acuity; smell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of increasing doses of lidocaine on olfactory perception. The odor stimulus was amyl acetate delivered at three different strengths. Data represent the mean detection (%) ± standard error (bars) from 6 participants for, no anesthetic (black circles and lines), and 30 mg, 60 mg and 120 mg lidocaine at 5 and 15 min following administration
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effect of 60 mg lidocaine on the perception of varying doses of amyl acetate. The different symbols represent different strengths of the amyl acetate stimulus; Level 1 (triangles), Level 2 (squares), and Level 3 (circles). Level 2 is ×2 and Level 3 is ×4 Level 1 (see Methods). Perceptual scores decreased 15 min following administration of 60 mg lidocaine but recovered by 30 min
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.
    Patel ZM, Holbrook EH, Turner JH, Adappa ND, Albers MW, Altundag A, Appenzeller S, Costanzo RM, Croy I, Davis GE, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Doty RL, Duffy VB, Goldstein BJ, Gudis DA, Haehner A, Higgins TS, Hopkins C, Huart C, Hummel T, Jitaroon K, Kern RC, Khanwalkar AR, Kobayashi M, Kondo K, Lane AP, Lechner M, Leopold DA, Levy JM, Marmura MJ, Mclelland L, Miwa T, Moberg PJ, Mueller CA, Nigwekar SU, O'Brien EK, Paunescu TG, Pellegrino R, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Reiter ER, Roalf DR, Rowan NR, Schlosser RJ, Schwob J, Seiden AM, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Sowerby L, Tan BK, Thamboo A, Wrobel B, Yan CH. Patel ZM, et al. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022. PMID: 35373533 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Ottoson D. Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1955;35:1–83. - PubMed
    1. Okhado T. Experimental and clinical studies on the electro-olfactogram (EOG) Otorhinolaryngology (Tokyo) 1984;27(2 Suppl):25–56.
    1. Kimura K. Olfactory nerve responses of the frog. Kumamoto Med J. 1961;14:37–46.
    1. Furukawa M, Kamide M, Ohkado T, Umeda R. Electro-olfactogram (EOG) in olfactometry. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1989;16:33–8. - PubMed
    1. Welge-Lüssen A, Wille C, Renner B, Kobal G. Anesthesia affects olfaction and chemosensory event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1384–91. - PubMed