Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 20;14(1):19.
doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0087-9.

Creating life and the media: translations and echoes

Affiliations
Review

Creating life and the media: translations and echoes

Manuel Porcar et al. Life Sci Soc Policy. .

Abstract

Synthetic biology is the engineering view on biotechnology that ultimately aims at fulfilling the quest of building an artificial cell. From the very first attempts of synthesizing life, this subject has made an impact on the media through, very often, misleading headlines and news. We review here the historical journalistic approach on synthetic biology and related disciplines, from the early twentieth century to the lastest achievements on designing protocells or genome reduction. However, it would be very naive to consider the research community and the media to be unidirectionally linked, with the latter being mere displayers (and disrupters) of the research "reality". On the contrary, the research community has also received a strong influence from the media, as evidenced by statements from researchers, common metaphors and, even, a trend to unconsciously develop shared techno-social paradigms. We conclude that, beyond overstatements from researchers and journalists' misunderstandings, both communities provide strong feedback to each other and, together, contribute to define the dream that synthetic biologists are aiming for.

Keywords: Artificial life; History of biology; Minimal cell; Popular science; Social media; Synthetic life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acevedo-Rocha CG, Hagen K, Engelhard M, Toepfer G. Ambivalences of creating life. Societal and philosophical dimensions of synthetic biology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. The synthetic nature of biology; pp. 9–53.
    1. Ananthaswamy A.. Rewiring nature with synthetic biology. Discover, October issue. 2014. http://discovermagazine.com/2014/oct/17-natures-technician. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.
    1. Ancillotti M, Rerimassie V, Seitz SB, Steurer W. An update of public perceptions of synthetic biology: still undecided? NanoEthics. 2016;10(3):309–325. doi: 10.1007/s11569-016-0256-3. - DOI
    1. Anonymous. Synthetic cells: it’s life, but not as we know it The Guardian 2010 22 May. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/may/22/craig-venter-synth.... Accessed 25 Feb 2018.
    1. Ausländer S, Ausländer D, Fussenegger M. Synthetic biology-the synthesis of biology. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(23):6396–6419. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609229. - DOI - PubMed