Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct:54:71-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group

P Robert  1 , K L Lanctôt  2 , L Agüera-Ortiz  3 , P Aalten  4 , F Bremond  5 , M Defrancesco  6 , C Hanon  7 , R David  8 , B Dubois  9 , K Dujardin  10 , M Husain  11 , A König  12 , R Levy  13 , V Mantua  14 , D Meulien  15 , D Miller  16 , H J Moebius  17 , J Rasmussen  18 , G Robert  19 , M Ruthirakuhan  2 , F Stella  20 , J Yesavage  21 , R Zeghari  22 , V Manera  5
Affiliations
Free article

Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group

P Robert et al. Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Apathy is a very common behavioural and psychological symptom across brain disorders. In the last decade, there have been considerable advances in research on apathy and motivation. It is thus important to revise the apathy diagnostic criteria published in 2009. The main objectives were to: a) revise the definition of apathy; b) update the list of apathy dimensions; c) operationalise the diagnostic criteria; and d) suggest appropriate assessment tools including new technologies.

Methods: The expert panel (N = 23) included researchers and health care professionals working on brain disorders and apathy, a representative of a regulatory body, and a representative of the pharmaceutical industry. The revised diagnostic criteria for apathy were developed in a two-step process. First, following the standard Delphi methodology, the experts were asked to answer questions via web-survey in two rounds. Second, all the collected information was discussed on the occasion of the 26th European Congress of Psychiatry held in Nice (France).

Results: Apathy was defined as a quantitative reduction of goal-directed activity in comparison to the patient's previous level of functioning (criterion A). Symptoms must persist for at least four weeks, and affect at least two of the three apathy dimensions (behaviour/cognition; emotion; social interaction; criterion B). Apathy should cause identifiable functional impairments (criterion C), and should not be fully explained by other factors, such as effects of a substance or major changes in the patient's environment (Criterion D).

Conclusions: The new diagnostic criteria for apathy provide a clinical and scientific framework to increase the validity of apathy as a clinical construct. This should also help to pave the path for apathy in brain disorders to be an interventional target.

Keywords: Apathy; Behaviour; Brain disorders; Emotion; Motivation; Neuropsychiatry; Social interaction; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Recommendations for the Nonpharmacological Treatment of Apathy in Brain Disorders.
    Manera V, Abrahams S, Agüera-Ortiz L, Bremond F, David R, Fairchild K, Gros A, Hanon C, Husain M, König A, Lockwood PL, Pino M, Radakovic R, Robert G, Slachevsky A, Stella F, Tribouillard A, Trimarchi PD, Verhey F, Yesavage J, Zeghari R, Robert P. Manera V, et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):410-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31495772
  • Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders.
    Miller DS, Robert P, Ereshefsky L, Adler L, Bateman D, Cummings J, DeKosky ST, Fischer CE, Husain M, Ismail Z, Jaeger J, Lerner AJ, Li A, Lyketsos CG, Manera V, Mintzer J, Moebius HJ, Mortby M, Meulien D, Pollentier S, Porsteinsson A, Rasmussen J, Rosenberg PB, Ruthirakuhan MT, Sano M, Zucchero Sarracini C, Lanctôt KL. Miller DS, et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Dec;17(12):1892-1904. doi: 10.1002/alz.12358. Epub 2021 May 5. Alzheimers Dement. 2021. PMID: 33949763 Free PMC article.
  • Proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
    Robert P, Onyike CU, Leentjens AF, Dujardin K, Aalten P, Starkstein S, Verhey FR, Yessavage J, Clement JP, Drapier D, Bayle F, Benoit M, Boyer P, Lorca PM, Thibaut F, Gauthier S, Grossberg G, Vellas B, Byrne J. Robert P, et al. Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;24(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.09.001. Epub 2009 Feb 7. Eur Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19201579
  • The nosological position of apathy in clinical practice.
    Starkstein SE, Leentjens AF. Starkstein SE, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;79(10):1088-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.136895. Epub 2008 Jan 10. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18187477 Review.
  • [The clinic of apathy in schizophrenia: a critical review of the issue].
    Yazbek H, Raffard S, Del-Monte J, Pupier F, Larue A, Boulenger JP, Gély-Nargeot MC, Capdevielle D. Yazbek H, et al. Encephale. 2014 Jun;40(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Aug 16. Encephale. 2014. PMID: 23958346 Review. French.
See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources