Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues
- PMID: 3012808
Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues
Abstract
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of Sulbactam (a new semisynthetic, injectable penicillanic acid sulfone) to inhibit beta-lactamase activity of bacteria in infections of the soft tissue. Sixty patients with documented soft tissue infections were prospectively randomized. One-half received 1 gram of Sulbactam per 2 grams of ampicillin every six hours. The other half received 600.0 milligrams of clindamycin every six hours and 1.5 milligrams per kilogram of tobramycin every eight hours. Patient groups were similar in age, sex, associated medical problems and bacteriologic flora of wounds. Sulbactam and ampicillin showed a 93 per cent cure rate or improvement as compared with 81 per cent in the clindamycin and tobramycin group. Eradication of organisms was better in the Sulbactam and ampicillin group (67 versus 35 per cent). Antibiotic activity of ampicillin was significantly augmented by the addition of Sulbactam. Of the 223 total bacteriologic isolates, 38 per cent were sensitive to ampicillin alone. Addition of Sulbactam improved sensitivity to 70 per cent. The Sulbactam and ampicillin combination is an effective combination for the treatment of soft tissue infections.
Similar articles
-
A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S583-8. Rev Infect Dis. 1986. PMID: 2879345 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of Pseudomonas species in patients treated with ampicillin and Sulbactam for gangrenous and perforated appendicitis.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Oct;161(4):303-7. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985. PMID: 2996161 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S569-75. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s569. Rev Infect Dis. 1986. PMID: 3026005 Clinical Trial.
-
Worldwide clinical experience with sultamicillin.APMIS Suppl. 1989;5:23-34. APMIS Suppl. 1989. PMID: 2660868 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in skin and soft tissue infections.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994;(573):51-5. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994. PMID: 7524796 Review.
Cited by
-
Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.Drugs. 1987 Jun;33(6):577-609. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733060-00003. Drugs. 1987. PMID: 3038500 Review.
-
Ampicillin/sulbactam: current status in severe bacterial infections.Drugs. 2007;67(13):1829-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00003. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17722953 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical