Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 14;6(1):1508272.
doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272. eCollection 2018.

Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia

Affiliations
Review

Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia

Junwen Zhou et al. J Mark Access Health Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Economic models are broadly used in the economic evaluation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Our objective was to summarize the structure of these models. Methods: Model-based economic evaluations of antipsychotics in schizophrenia were identified through Medline and Embase. General information was extracted including analysis type, model type, perspective, population, comparator, outcome, and timeframe. Model-specific structures for decision tree (DT), cohort- and patient-level Markov model (CLMM, PLMM), and discrete-event simulation (DES) models were extracted. Results: A screen of 1870 records identified 79 studies. These were mostly cost-utility analyses (n = 48) with CLMM (n = 32) or DT models (n = 29). They mostly applied payer perspective (n = 68), focused on general schizophrenia for relapse prevention (n = 73), compared pharmacotherapies as first-line (n = 71), and evaluated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (n = 40) with a 1-year (n = 32) or 5-year (n = 26) projection. DT models progressed with the branching points of response, relapse, discontinuation, and adherence. CLMM models transitioned between disease states, whereas PLMM models transitioned between adverse event states with/without disease state. DES models moved forward with times to remission, relapse, psychiatrist visit, and death. Conclusions: A pattern of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia was identified. More subtle structures and patient-level models are suggested for a future modelling exercise.

Keywords: Schizophrenia; antipsychotics; economic model; model structure; pharmacoeconomics; pharmacotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screening process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jin H, Mosweu I.. The societal cost of schizophrenia: A systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:25–10. - PubMed
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380:2163–2196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative effi cacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2013;382:951–962. - PubMed
    1. Revicki DA, Luce BR, Weschler JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1990;41:850–854. - PubMed
    1. Achilla E, McCrone P. The cost effectiveness of long-acting/extended-release antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review of economic evaluations. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11:95–106. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources