Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 1;136(10):1170-1179.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3352.

Research Questions and Outcomes Prioritized by Patients With Dry Eye

Affiliations

Research Questions and Outcomes Prioritized by Patients With Dry Eye

Ian J Saldanha et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Dry eye is a common ocular surface condition with significant influence on patient quality of life and societal economic burden. There is an urgent need to prioritize new research for dry eye.

Objective: To identify and rank research questions and outcomes important to patients with dry eye.

Design, setting, and participants: This study was conducted using the following 6 steps: (1) identifying research questions from a previous survey of clinicians who treat patients with dry eye; (2) identifying outcomes from existing research (systematic reviews and their cited clinical trials in the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Satellite database of eyes and vision reviews, and National Eye Institute-funded clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov) as of June 13, 2017; (3) identifying a sample of patients with dry eye from the email subscribers to the online newsletter KeratoScoop; (4) and (5) conducting a 2-round Delphi survey of those patients online in November and December 2017, respectively; and (6) designating and ranking questions and outcomes as important.

Main outcomes and measures: Importance assigned to research questions and outcomes for dry eye. A research question or outcome ranked by at least 75% of patients as 6 or higher on a scale of 0 to 10 was considered important.

Results: Among the 420 patients from 15 countries who completed both rounds of the Delphi survey, most were 60 years of age or older (233 [56%]), female (348 [83%]), white (393 [94%]), and of non-Hispanic ethnicity (398 [95%]). Among the 12 questions that clinicians had previously prioritized, patients rated 8 as important. The top 3 questions pertained to effectiveness of patient education, environmental modifications, and topical anti-inflammatory eye drops for dry eye. Among the 109 outcomes identified in existing research on dry eye, patients rated 26 as important. Ten of these 26 were unpopular in existing research, with fewer than 10% of 158 studies reporting these outcomes. Of the 10 most important outcomes, 9 were associated with symptoms or quality of life. The 3 outcomes rated most important by patients were ocular burning or stinging, ocular discomfort, and ocular pain.

Conclusions and relevance: This study identified research questions and outcomes important to patients with dry eye. A considerable gap was noted between outcomes in existing research on dry eye and outcomes patients consider important. Future research on dry eye should consider addressing the important research questions and outcomes identified herein, taking into account the patient perspective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Ms Petris reported being the sole proprietor and president of the Dry Eye Company LLC, a for-profit corporation that oversees the family of entities Dry Eye Zone (an information portal), Dry Eye Shop (an online store), Dry Eye Talk (a place for discussion among subscribers), Dry Eye Digest (Ms Petris’s blog), and KeratoScoop (Ms Petris’s newsletter).

The Dry Eye Company does not accept any commercial funding; its profits are generated solely through product sales on the Dry Eye Shop. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Steps and Flow of Survey Participants, Research Questions, and Outcomes in This Study
NEI indicates National Eye Institute.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Research Questions, Ratings of Importance, and Ranking in Round 1 of the Delphi Survey
IQR indicates interquartile range.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Outcomes, Ratings of Importance, and Ranking in Round 2 of the Delphi Survey
IQR indicates interquartile range. a The 18 popular outcomes in existing research are ocular burning or stinging; ocular discomfort; ocular dryness; visual acuity; patient’s overall assessment of ocular surface symptoms; ocular foreign body sensation; tear film stability; ocular adverse events; artificial tear use; tear production or volume; corneal staining; nonocular adverse events; conjunctival hyperemia; ocular surface staining; conjunctival staining; conjunctival impression cytology; dryness of the mouth; and salivary flow. bThe 10 unpopular outcomes in existing research are ocular pain; influence of dry eye disease on patient’s daily life; vision-related quality of life; patient’s acceptability or satisfaction with treatment; ocular gritty or sandy sensation; overall assessment of treatment effectiveness assessed by patients; ocular tiredness or fatigue; photosensitivity or photophobia; intolerance to air drafts; and treatment cost.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Preferred Outcome Measurement Periods for All 28 Outcomes Rated in Round 2 of the Delphi Survey
aFor the 18 popular outcomes in existing research (ocular burning or stinging; ocular discomfort; ocular dryness; visual acuity; patient’s overall assessment of ocular surface symptoms; ocular foreign body sensation; tear film stability; ocular adverse events; artificial tear use; tear production or volume; corneal staining; nonocular adverse events; conjunctival hyperemia; ocular surface staining; conjunctival staining; conjunctival impression cytology; dryness of the mouth; and salivary flow), we obtained preferred measurement periods during Delphi round 1 (n = 622 patients). For each outcome, we allowed patients to indicate multiple measurement periods. bFor the 10 unpopular outcomes in existing research (ocular pain; influence of dry eye disease on patient’s daily life; vision-related quality of life; patient’s acceptability or satisfaction with treatment; ocular gritty or sandy sensation; overall assessment of treatment effectiveness assessed by patients; ocular tiredness or fatigue; photosensitivity or photophobia; intolerance to air drafts; and treatment cost), we obtained preferred measurement periods during Delphi round 2 (n = 420 patients). For each outcome, we allowed patients to indicate multiple measurement periods.

Comment in

References

    1. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3): 334–365. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun MJ, Rubin GS, Akpek EK, Ramulu PY. Impact of glaucoma and dry eye on text-based searching. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017;6(3):24. doi:10.1167/tvst.6.3.24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA. Dry eye disease: impact of quality of life and vision. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2013;1(2):51–57. doi:10.1007/s40135-013-0009-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:405–412. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S5555 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathews PM, Ramulu PY, Swenor BS, Utine CA, Rubin GS, Akpek EK. Functional impairment of reading in patients with dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(4):481–486. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015−308237 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances