Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;46(3):638-649.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4134-9. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

PET-based prognostic survival model after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Affiliations

PET-based prognostic survival model after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Joël Castelli et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The aims of this multicentre retrospective study of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated with definitive radiotherapy were to (1) identify positron emission tomography (PET)-18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) parameters correlated with overall survival (OS) in a training cohort, (2) compute a prognostic model, and (3) externally validate this model in an independent cohort.

Materials and methods: A total of 237 consecutive LAHNC patients divided into training (n = 127) and validation cohorts (n = 110) were retrospectively analysed. The following PET parameters were analysed: SUVMax, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and SUVMean for the primary tumour and lymph nodes using a relative SUVMax threshold or an absolute SUV threshold. Cox analyses were performed on OS in the training cohort. The c-index was used to identify the highly prognostic parameters. A prognostic model was subsequently identified, and a nomogram was generated. The model was externally tested in the validation cohort.

Results: In univariate analysis, the significant PET parameters for the primary tumour included MTV (relative thresholds from 6 to 83% and absolute thresholds from 1.5 to 6.5) and TLG (relative thresholds from 1 to 82% and absolute thresholds from 0.5 to 4.5). For the lymph nodes, the significant parameters included MTV and TLG regardless of the threshold value. In multivariate analysis, tumour site, p16 status, MTV35% of the primary tumour, and MTV44% of the lymph nodes were independent predictors of OS. Based on these four parameters, a prognostic model was identified with a c-index of 0.72. The corresponding nomogram was generated. This prognostic model was externally validated, achieving a c-index of 0.66.

Conclusions: A prognostic model of OS based on primary tumour and lymph node MTV, tumour site, and p16 status was proposed and validated. The corresponding nomogram may be used to tailor individualized treatment.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; Nomogram; PET; Prognostic score; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47 - PubMed
    1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 06;13:33 - PubMed
    1. Laryngoscope. 2014 Dec;124(12):2732-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Aug;39(8):1297-305 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2013 Oct;54(10):1703-9 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources