Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 22;11(2):201-212.
doi: 10.1093/phe/phx027. eCollection 2018 Jul.

The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014-2016 West African Ebola Outbreak

Catherine R McGowan  1 , Catherine F Houlihan  2 , Patricia Kingori  3 , Judith R Glynn  4
Affiliations

The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014-2016 West African Ebola Outbreak

Catherine R McGowan et al. Public Health Ethics. .

Abstract

Online participation in research is used increasingly to recruit geographically dispersed populations. Obtaining online consent is convenient, yet we know little about the acceptability of this practice. We carried out a serostudy among personnel returning to the UK/Ireland following deployment to West Africa during the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic. We used an online procedure for consenting returnees and designed a small descriptive study to understand: how much of the consent material they read, how informed they felt and if they preferred online to traditional face-to-face consent. Of 261 returnees, 111 (43 per cent) completed the consent survey. Participants indicated a high level of engagement with the consent materials, with 67 per cent reporting having read all and 20 per cent having read 'most' of the materials. All participants indicated feeling completely (78 per cent) or mostly (22 per cent) informed about the purpose, methods and intended uses of the research, as well as what participation was required and what risks were involved. Only three participants indicated a preference for face-to-face consent. Free-text comments suggested that online consent may be an acceptable modality for uncomplicated and low-risk studies. The study sample was largely composed of health professionals, suggesting acceptability of online consent within this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
How much of the consent material do you recall reading?
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agre P., McKee K., Gargon N., Kurtz R. C. (1997). Patient Satisfaction with an Informed Consent Process. Cancer Pract, 5, 162–167. - PubMed
    1. Antoniou E. E., Draper H., Reed K., Burls A., Southwood T. R., Zeegers M. P. (2011). An Empirical Study on the Preferred Size of the Participant Information Sheet in Research. J Med Ethics, 37, 557–562. - PubMed
    1. Buchanan E. A., Hvizdak E. E. (2009). Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethic, 4, 37–48. - PubMed
    1. Collins S., McKeown T., Bombardier C., Heslegrave R. (2015). Pilot Evaluation of an Electronic Research Platform Supporting e-Consent. J Rheumatol, 42, 1281–1282.
    1. Doerr M., Maguire Truong A., Bot B. M., Wilbanks J., Suver C., Mangravite L. M. (2017). Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience with Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 5, e14. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources