Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;80(10):2600-2632.
doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-0477-4. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Non-local Parabolic and Hyperbolic Models for Cell Polarisation in Heterogeneous Cancer Cell Populations

Affiliations

Non-local Parabolic and Hyperbolic Models for Cell Polarisation in Heterogeneous Cancer Cell Populations

Vasiliki Bitsouni et al. Bull Math Biol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Tumours consist of heterogeneous populations of cells. The sub-populations can have different features, including cell motility, proliferation and metastatic potential. The interactions between clonal sub-populations are complex, from stable coexistence to dominant behaviours. The cell-cell interactions, i.e. attraction, repulsion and alignment, processes critical in cancer invasion and metastasis, can be influenced by the mutation of cancer cells. In this study, we develop a mathematical model describing cancer cell invasion and movement for two polarised cancer cell populations with different levels of mutation. We consider a system of non-local hyperbolic equations that incorporate cell-cell interactions in the speed and the turning behaviour of cancer cells, and take a formal parabolic limit to transform this model into a non-local parabolic model. We then investigate the possibility of aggregations to form, and perform numerical simulations for both hyperbolic and parabolic models, comparing the patterns obtained for these models.

Keywords: Aggregation patterns; Alignment; Cancer cells; Cell–cell interactions; Non-local hyperbolic model; Parabolic limit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The dispersion relation (21) for the steady state 0,0,0,0. a Plot of the larger eigenvalues λlk=-Dlk+Dl2k-4Elk/2,l=1,2, obtained by dispersion relations (21) for D1,E1 (blue) and D2,E2 (red); b the effect of γ on the graph of Reλ2k; c the effect of r2 on the graph of Reλ2k; d the effect of λ2r on the graph of Reλ2k. The continuous curves represent the Re(λ(k)), while the dotted curves represent the Im(λ(k)). The model parameters are given in Table 2. The diamonds on the x-axis represent the discrete wave numbers kj=2πj/L,j=1,2, (Color figure online)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The dispersion relation (26) for the steady state 0,0,0.5,0.5. a Plot of the larger eigenvalues λlk=-Dlk+Dl2k-4Elk/2,l=3,4, obtained by dispersion relations (26) for D3,E3 (blue) and D4,E4 (red); b the effect of γ on the graph of Reλ4k; c the effect of r2 on the graph of Reλ4k; d the effect of λ2r on the graph of Reλ4k; e the effect of qa on the graph of Reλ4k; f the effect of qr on the graph of Reλ4k. The continuous curves represent the Re(λ(k)), while the dotted curves represent the Im(λ(k)). The model parameters are given in Table 2. The diamonds on the x-axis represent the discrete wave numbers kj=2πj/L,j=1,2, (Color figure online)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Plot of the eigenvalue with the maximum real part, after parabolic scaling, of a relation (21) for the s.s. 0,0,0,0 for qal=0; b relation (26) for the s.s. 0,0,0.5,0.5 for qal=0. The continuous curves represent the Re(λ(k)), while the dotted curves represent the Im(λ(k)). The rest of the model parameters are given in Table 2. For graphical purposes, the discrete wave numbers has been omitted (Color figure online)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Plot of the eigenvalues obtained by dispersion relation (31). a λ1k=-k2Du1-M+r1 (blue) and λ2k=-k2Du2+r2 (red) for the steady state 0,0; b λ1k=-k2Du1-M (blue) and λ2k=-k2Du2+Ykλ2bf-2/(2λ2r)-1-r2 (red), for the steady state 0,1. The model parameters are given in Table 2. The continuous curves represent the Reλ(k), as the imaginary part of the eigenvalues is zero (represented by dotted lines) in the case of the parabolic model [see relations (31)–(33)]. The diamonds on the x-axis represent the discrete wave numbers kj=2πj/L,j=1,2, (Color figure online)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The dispersion relation (31) for the steady state 0,1. a The effect of λ2r on the graph of Reλ2k; b the effect of qr on the graph of Reλ2k; the rest of the model parameters are given in Table 2. The diamonds on the x-axis represent the discrete wave numbers kj=2πj/L,j=1,2, (Color figure online)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Patterns exhibited by the hyperbolic model (1). The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations are described by small random perturbations of the steady state 0,0,0,0 [see (34)]. a, b Total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for r1=0.1 and r2=0.2; a’, b’ total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for r1=0.3 and r2=0.4; a”, b” total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for r1=r2=0.1. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Patterns exhibited by the hyperbolic model (1). The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations are described by small random perturbations of the steady state 0,0,0,0 [see (34)]. a, b Total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for λ1,2r=0.2 and γ=0.1; a’, b’ total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for λ1,2r=0.4 and γ=0.1; a”, b” total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for λ1,2r=0.2 and γ=1. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Patterns exhibited by the hyperbolic model (1). The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations are described by small random perturbations of the steady state 0,0,0.5,0.5 [see (34)]. a, b Total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for qa=6,qr=0.1 and qal=3; a’, b’ total density of u1=u1++u1- and u2=u2++u2- for qa=1.2,qr=6.5 and qal=3. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Patterns exhibited by the hyperbolic model (1) for qal=0.5 and λ1,2r=0.1. The rest of model parameters as given in Table 2. The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations consist of a rectangular pulse [see (35)]. ad show the density of right-moving cancer cells u1+ (a, b) and u2+ (c, d). a’d’ show the density of left-moving cancer cells u1- (a’, b’) and u2- (c’, d’). a”d” show the total density of cancer cells u1 (a”, b”) and u2 (c”, d”) (Color figure online)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Patterns exhibited by the hyperbolic model (1) showing the cancer cell density for γ=0.01. The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations consist of a rectangular pulse [see (35)]. a, b Total density of u1 and u2 for qal=0; a’, b’ total density of u1 and u2 for qal=10. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
The spatiotemporal patterns obtained with the hyperbolic model (1) for qal=0 after scaling, and the parabolic model (12). a, b Standing waves obtained by (1) after scaling for ϵ=1; a’, b’ stationary pulses obtained by (1) after scaling for ϵ=0.5; a”, b” stationary pulses obtained by (12) when ϵ0. The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations are described by small random perturbation of the steady state 0,0,0.5,0.5, for the rescaled hyperbolic model, and 0,1, for the parabolic model [see (34) and (36)]. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Patterns exhibited by the parabolic model (12). The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations are described by small random perturbations of the steady state 0,1 [see (36)]. Total density of u1 and u2 for qa=6,qr=0.1 and qal=0. The rest of the model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Patterns exhibited by the parabolic model (12) showing the cancer cell density for γ=0.01. The initial conditions for the two cancer cell populations consist of a rectangular pulse [see (37)]. a, b Total density of u1 and u2 for qa=1.2,qr=0.1 and qal=0. The rest of model parameters are given in Table 2 (Color figure online)

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ, Newman EL, Steele RJC, Thompson AM. Mathematical modelling of tumour invasion and metastasis. J Theor Med. 2000;2(2):129–154. doi: 10.1080/10273660008833042. - DOI
    1. Angelini T, Hannezo E, Trepat X, Fredberg J, Weitz D. Cell migration driven by cooperative substrate deformation patterns. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(16):168104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.168104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arboleda-Estudillo Y, Krieg M, Stühmer J, Licata NA, Muller DJ, Heisenberg CP. Movement directionality in collective migration of germ layer progenitors. Curr Biol. 2010;20(2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong NJ, Painter KJ, Sherratt JA. A continuum approach to modelling cell–cell adhesion. J Theor Biol. 2006;243(1):98–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bitsouni V, Chaplain MAJ, Eftimie R. Mathematical modelling of cancer invasion: the multiple roles of TGF-β pathway on tumour proliferation and cell adhesion. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2017;27(10):1929–1962. doi: 10.1142/S021820251750035X. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources