Sudden infant death and social justice: A syndemics approach
- PMID: 30136404
- PMCID: PMC7198924
- DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12652
Sudden infant death and social justice: A syndemics approach
Abstract
Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) prevention has focused on modifying individual behavioural risk factors, especially bedsharing. Yet these deaths are most common among poor and marginalized people in wealthy countries, including U.S. Blacks, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, New Zealand Māori, Australian Aborigines, indigenous Canadians, and low-income British people. The United States now has the world's highest prevalence of SUID/SIDS, where even Whites' SIDS prevalence now approaches that of the Māori. Using public databases and the literature, we examine SUID/SIDS prevalence and the following risk factors in selected world populations: maternal smoking, preterm birth, alcohol use, poor prenatal care, sleep position, bedsharing, and formula feeding. Our findings suggest that risk factors cluster in high-prevalence populations, many are linked to poverty and discrimination and have independent effects on perinatal outcomes. Moreover, populations with the world's lowest rates of SUID/SIDS have low income-inequality or high relative wealth, yet have high to moderate rates of bedsharing. Employing syndemics theory, we suggest that disproportionately high prevalence of SUID/SIDS is primarily the result of socially driven, co-occurring epidemics that may act synergistically to amplify risk. SUID must be examined through the lens of structural inequity and the legacy of historical trauma. Emphasis on bedsharing may divert attention from risk reduction from structural interventions, breastfeeding, prenatal care, and tobacco cessation. Medical organizations play an important role in advocating for policies that address the root causes of infant mortality via poverty and discrimination interventions, tobacco control, and culturally appropriate support to families.
Keywords: SIDS; SUID; breastfeeding; infant mortality; infant sleep; tobacco.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Bartick has no competing conflicts of interest regarding breastfeeding and infant sleep. Her current funding is for breastfeeding and economics research and came from the WK Kellogg Foundation. Dr Tomori has no current sleep‐related funding. Her past funding came from the Alfred P. Sloan Center for the Ethnography of Everyday Life; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development; and the Rackham Graduate School, the Department of Anthropology, and the Center for the Education of Women at the University of Michigan.
References
-
- Abel, S. , & Tipene‐Leach, D. (2013). SUDI prevention: A review of Māori safe sleep innovations for infants. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 126(1379), 86–94. - PubMed
-
- Adam, E. K. , Heissel, J. A. , Zeiders, K. H. , Richeson, J. A. , Ross, E. C. , Ehrlich, K. B. , … Eccles, J. S. (2015). Developmental histories of perceived racial discrimination and diurnal cortisol profiles in adulthood: A 20‐year prospective study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 279–291. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Australian Government, & Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2014). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island health performance framework 2014 report retrieved from Canberra: https://www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/indigenous/Healt...
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2015). Australia's mothers and babies 2015. Canberra: Australian Government.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
