Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account
- PMID: 30136737
- DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12471
Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account
Abstract
The concept of vulnerability is widely used in research ethics to signal attention to participants who require special protections in research. However, this concept is vague and under-theorized. There is also growing concern that the dominant categorical approach to vulnerability (as exemplified by research ethics regulations and guidelines delineating vulnerable groups) is ethically problematic because of its assumptions about groups of people and is, in fact, not very guiding. An agreed-upon strategy is to move from categorical towards analytical approaches (focused on analyzing types and sources of vulnerability) to vulnerability. Beyond this agreement, however, scholars have been advancing competing accounts of vulnerability without consensus about its appropriate operationalization in research ethics. Based on previous debates, we propose that a comprehensive account of vulnerability for research ethics must include four components: definition, normative justifications, application, and implications. Concluding that no existing accounts integrate these components in a functional (i.e., practically applicable) manner, we propose an integrative and functional account of vulnerability inspired by pragmatist theory and enriched by bioethics literature. Using an example of research on deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression, we illustrate how the integrative-functional account can guide the analysis of vulnerability in research within a pragmatist, evidence-based approach to research ethics. While ultimately there are concerns to be addressed in existing research ethics guidelines on vulnerability, the integrative-functional account can serve as an analytic tool to help researchers, research ethics boards, and other relevant actors fill in the gaps in the current landscape of research ethics governance.
Keywords: pragmatism; research ethics; research ethics boards; vulnerability; vulnerable populations.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines.Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 7;15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017. PMID: 28173859 Free PMC article.
-
Vulnerability in research ethics: a way forward.Bioethics. 2013 Jul;27(6):333-40. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12032. Epub 2013 May 30. Bioethics. 2013. PMID: 23718774
-
Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability - a way forward.Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12206. Epub 2018 Jul 30. Dev World Bioeth. 2019. PMID: 30058768 Free PMC article.
-
Vulnerability: An integrative bioethics review and a proposed taxonomy.Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):750-765. doi: 10.1177/0969733020976180. Epub 2021 Jan 12. Nurs Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33430706 Review.
-
Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research.J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):657-663. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103955. Epub 2017 Jul 17. J Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28716977 Review.
Cited by
-
A Review of the Literature on the Multiple Forms of Stigmatization of Caregivers of Children with Autism Among Ethnic Minority Groups.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Feb;11(1):545-559. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01540-6. Epub 2023 Mar 6. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024. PMID: 36877377 Review.
-
Social Media Recruitment as a Potential Trigger for Vulnerability: Multistakeholder Interview Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Dec 30;11:e52448. doi: 10.2196/52448. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39749923 Free PMC article.
-
Patient vulnerability in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR): a preliminary ethical appraisal from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium.Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Oct;200(10):903-907. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02230-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024. PMID: 38652131 Free PMC article.
-
IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jun;23(6):75-88. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434. Epub 2022 Apr 28. Am J Bioeth. 2023. PMID: 35482887 Free PMC article.
-
Vulnerability in research ethics: A systematic review of policy guidelines and documents.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327086. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40591537 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources