Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;29(9):1895-1902.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy263.

A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT)

Affiliations

A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT)

J Mateo et al. Ann Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: In order to facilitate implementation of precision medicine in clinical management of cancer, there is a need to harmonise and standardise the reporting and interpretation of clinically relevant genomics data.

Methods: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) launched a collaborative project to propose a classification system for molecular aberrations based on the evidence available supporting their value as clinical targets. A group of experts from several institutions was assembled to review available evidence, reach a consensus on grading criteria and present a classification system. This was then reviewed, amended and finally approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership.

Results: This first version of the ESMO Scale of Clinical Actionability for molecular Targets (ESCAT) defines six levels of clinical evidence for molecular targets according to the implications for patient management: tier I, targets ready for implementation in routine clinical decisions; tier II, investigational targets that likely define a patient population that benefits from a targeted drug but additional data are needed; tier III, clinical benefit previously demonstrated in other tumour types or for similar molecular targets; tier IV, preclinical evidence of actionability; tier V, evidence supporting co-targeting approaches; and tier X, lack of evidence for actionability.

Conclusions: The ESCAT defines clinical evidence-based criteria to prioritise genomic alterations as markers to select patients for targeted therapies. This classification system aims to offer a common language for all the relevant stakeholders in cancer medicine and drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • ESCAT: a step in the right direction.
    Silver AJ, Warner JL. Silver AJ, et al. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2266-2267. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy409. Ann Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30215682 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hyman DM, Taylor BS, Baselga J.. Implementing genome-driven oncology. Cell 2017; 168(4): 584–599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH. et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10, 000 patients. Nat Med 2017; 23(6): 703–713. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tannock IF, Hickman JA.. Limits to personalized cancer medicine. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(13): 1289–1294. - PubMed
    1. Marketing personalized cancer treatments requires careful language. Nature 2018; 558(7708): 5–6. - PubMed
    1. Andre F, Mardis E, Salm M. et al. Prioritizing targets for precision cancer medicine. Ann Oncol 2014; 25(12): 2295–2303. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms