Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):108-117.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey121.

Left ventricular thrombus formation in myocardial infarction is associated with altered left ventricular blood flow energetics

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Left ventricular thrombus formation in myocardial infarction is associated with altered left ventricular blood flow energetics

Pankaj Garg et al. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Aims: The main aim of this study was to characterize changes in the left ventricular (LV) blood flow kinetic energy (KE) using four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) with/without LV thrombus (LVT).

Methods and results: This is a prospective cohort study of 108 subjects [controls = 40, MI patients without LVT (LVT- = 36), and MI patients with LVT (LVT+ = 32)]. All underwent CMR including whole-heart 4D flow. LV blood flow KE wall calculated using the formula: KE=12 ρblood . Vvoxel . v2, where ρ = density, V = volume, v = velocity, and was indexed to LV end-diastolic volume. Patient with MI had significantly lower LV KE components than controls (P < 0.05). LVT+ and LVT- patients had comparable infarct size and apical regional wall motion score (P > 0.05). The relative drop in A-wave KE from mid-ventricle to apex and the proportion of in-plane KE were higher in patients with LVT+ compared with LVT- (87 ± 9% vs. 78 ± 14%, P = 0.02; 40 ± 5% vs. 36 ± 7%, P = 0.04, respectively). The time difference of peak E-wave KE demonstrated a significant rise between the two groups (LVT-: 38 ± 38 ms vs. LVT+: 62 ± 56 ms, P = 0.04). In logistic-regression, the relative drop in A-wave KE (beta = 11.5, P = 0.002) demonstrated the strongest association with LVT.

Conclusion: Patients with MI have reduced global LV flow KE. Additionally, MI patients with LVT have significantly reduced and delayed wash-in of the LV. The relative drop of distal intra-ventricular A-wave KE, which represents the distal late-diastolic wash-in of the LV, is most strongly associated with the presence of LVT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. A, acute reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction; C, chronic myocardial infarction; CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement imaging; MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Left ventricular short-axis endocardial segmentation in patient with LV thrombus. Intra-cavity thrombus was manually contoured (orange contour) to avoid under-estimation of LV KE parameters. Intra-cavity KE of blood is demonstrated at peak late ventricular filling (peak A-wave). (B) Illustration of KE curve demonstrating majority of the KE parameters studied.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Late gadolinium enhancement imaging of two case examples from the study population with anterior MI. Infarct characteristics alone did not differentiate the two cases for LVT. Left ventricular KE flow analysis demonstrated rise in in-plane, rotational KE, and reduced A-wave wash-in of the LV. EF, ejection fraction; KE, kinetic energy; LVT, left ventricular thrombus.
Figure 4
Figure 4
LV flow component KE curves in different study subjects. (A) KE curves for total and in-plane LV KE. The minimal KE is marked by orange arrows. (B) Regional KE curves for base, mid, and apex of the LV. Time differences to peak E-wave KE propagation also demonstrated progressive increase (gapes between dotted lines marked by red arrows). Blue arrows point to drop in A-wave KE from mid-ventricle to apex. KE, kinetic energy; LV, left ventricle; LVT−, patients without LV thrombus; LVT+, patients with LV thrombus; MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bar graph of the main LV blood flow kinetic energy parameters which demonstrated significant changes in patients with/without thrombus (whiskers: interquartile range). KE, kinetic energy; LVT−, patients without LV thrombus; LVT+, patients with LV thrombus.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Receiver operating curve analysis for the presence of LVT.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vaitkus PT, Barnathan ES.. Embolic potential, prevention and management of mural thrombus complicating anterior myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1004–9. - PubMed
    1. Solheim S, Seljeflot I, Lunde K, Bjørnerheim R, Aakhus S, Forfang K. et al. Frequency of left ventricular thrombus in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:1197–200. - PubMed
    1. Visser CA, Kan G, Meltzer RS, Dunning AJ, Roelandt J.. Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 119 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1276–80. - PubMed
    1. Celik S, Baykan M, Erdöl C, Gökce M, Durmus İ, Örem C. et al. Doppler-derived mitral deceleration time as an early predictor of left ventricular thrombus after first anterior acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2000;140:772–6. - PubMed
    1. Maze SS, Kotler MN, Parry WR.. Flow characteristics in the dilated left ventricle with thrombus: qualitative and quantitative Doppler analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:873–81. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms