Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1567-1578.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy094.

Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review

Affiliations

Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review

Kerry A McBrien et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objectives: Data derived from primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) are being used for research and surveillance. Case definitions are required to identify patients with specific conditions in EMR data with a degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study is to identify and provide a summary of case definitions that have been validated in primary care EMR data.

Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase (from inception to June 2016) to identify studies that describe case definitions for clinical conditions in EMR data and report on the performance metrics of these definitions.

Results: We identified 40 studies reporting on case definitions for 47 unique clinical conditions. The studies used combinations of International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD-9) codes, Read codes, laboratory values, and medications in their algorithms. The most common validation metric reported was positive predictive value, with inconsistent reporting of sensitivity and specificity.

Discussion: This review describes validated case definitions derived in primary care EMR data, which can be used to understand disease patterns and prevalence among primary care populations. Limitations include incomplete reporting of performance metrics and uncertainty regarding performance of case definitions across different EMR databases and countries.

Conclusion: Our review found a significant number of validated case definitions with good performance for use in primary care EMR data. These could be applied to other EMR databases in similar contexts and may enable better disease surveillance when using clinical EMR data. Consistent reporting across validation studies using EMR data would facilitate comparison across studies.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016040020 (submitted June 8, 2016, and last revised June 14, 2016).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of study characteristics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murdoch TB, Detsky AS.. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 2013; 30913: 1351–2. - PubMed
    1. Deniz S, Şengül A, Aydemir Y, Çeldir Emre J, Özhan MH.. Clinical factors and comorbidities affecting the cost of hospital-treated COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 111: 3023–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quan H, Smith M, Bartlett-Esquilant G, Johansen H, Tu K, Lix L.. Mining administrative health databases to advance medical science: geographical considerations and untapped potential in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2012; 282: 152–4. - PubMed
    1. Biro SC, Barber DT, Kotecha JA.. Trends in the use of electronic medical records. Can Fam Physician 2012; 581: e21.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williamson T, Green ME, Birtwhistle R, et al. Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records. Ann Fam Med 2014; 124: 367–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types