Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;108(10):1394-1400.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304590. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Modeling Health Benefits and Harms of Public Policy Responses to the US Opioid Epidemic

Affiliations

Modeling Health Benefits and Harms of Public Policy Responses to the US Opioid Epidemic

Allison L Pitt et al. Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate health outcomes of policies to mitigate the opioid epidemic.

Methods: We used dynamic compartmental modeling of US adults, in various pain, opioid use, and opioid addiction health states, to project addiction-related deaths, life years, and quality-adjusted life years from 2016 to 2025 for 11 policy responses to the opioid epidemic.

Results: Over 5 years, increasing naloxone availability, promoting needle exchange, expanding medication-assisted addiction treatment, and increasing psychosocial treatment increased life years and quality-adjusted life years and reduced deaths. Other policies reduced opioid prescription supply and related deaths but led some addicted prescription users to switch to heroin use, which increased heroin-related deaths. Over a longer horizon, some such policies may avert enough new addiction to outweigh the harms. No single policy is likely to substantially reduce deaths over 5 to 10 years.

Conclusions: Policies focused on services for addicted people improve population health without harming any groups. Policies that reduce the prescription opioid supply may increase heroin use and reduce quality of life in the short term, but in the long term could generate positive health benefits. A portfolio of interventions will be needed for eventual mitigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Estimated Effects of Reduced Prescribing for Chronic Pain on Addiction Incidence: United States, 2016–2025 Note. SOUD = severe prescription opioid use disorder; SHUD = severe heroin use disorder. Mean effects of the reduced prescribing for chronic pain policy on monthly incidence, relative to without intervention, of SOUD and SHUD.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Estimated Effects of Reduced Prescribing for Chronic Pain on Addiction Prevalence and Deaths: United States, 2016–2025 Note. SOUD = severe prescription opioid use disorder; SHUD = severe heroin use disorder. Mean effects of the reduced prescribing for chronic pain policy on prevalence and deaths, relative to without intervention, of or from SOUD and SHUD.

Comment in

  • We Cannot Treat the Dead.
    Goodin AJ. Goodin AJ. Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1286-1288. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304658. Am J Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30207778 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Ahmad FB, Rossen LM, Spencer MR, Warner M, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
    1. Krashin D, Sullivan M, Ballantyne J. What are we treating with chronic opioid therapy? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15(3):311. - PubMed
    1. Meldrum ML. The ongoing opioid prescription epidemic: historical context. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(8):1365–1366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lembke A, Humphreys K, Newmark J. Weighing the risks and benefits of chronic opioid therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(12):982–990. - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp GA, Winstanley EL, Ryan SA, Lyons MS. Moving beyond misuse and diversion: the urgent need to consider the role of iatrogenic addiction in the current opioid epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(11):2023–2029. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms