Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):346.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1972-1.

Screening and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in antenatal and labor and delivery services: findings from cross-sectional observation studies in six sub-Saharan African countries

Affiliations
Observational Study

Screening and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in antenatal and labor and delivery services: findings from cross-sectional observation studies in six sub-Saharan African countries

Barbara Rawlins et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia and eclampsia (PE/E) are major contributors to maternal and neonatal deaths in developing countries, associated with 10-15% of direct maternal deaths and nearly a quarter of stillbirths and newborn deaths, many of which are preventable with improved care. We present results related to WHO-recommended interventions for screening and management of PE/E during antenatal care (ANC) and labor and delivery (L & D) from a study conducted in six sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods: From 2010 to 2012, cross-sectional studies which directly observed provision of ANC and L & D services in six sub-Saharan African countries were conducted. Results from 643 health facilities of different levels in Ethiopia (n = 19), Kenya (n = 509), Madagascar (n = 36), Mozambique (n = 46), Rwanda (n = 72), and Tanzania (n = 52), were combined for this analysis. While studies were sampled separately in each country, all used standardized observation checklists and inventory assessment tools.

Results: 2920 women receiving ANC and 2689 women in L & D were observed. Thirty-nine percent of ANC clients were asked about PE/E danger signs, and 68% had their blood pressure (BP) taken correctly (range 48-96%). Roughly half (46%) underwent testing for proteinuria. Twenty-three percent of women in L & D were asked about PE/E danger signs (range 11-34%); 77% had their BP checked upon admission (range 59-85%); and 6% had testing for proteinuria. Twenty-five cases of severe PE/E were observed: magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) was used in 15, not used in 5, and for 5 use was unknown. The availability of MgSO4 in L & D varied from 16% in Ethiopia to 100% in Mozambique.

Conclusions: Observed ANC consultations and L & D cases showed low use of WHO-recommended practices for PE/E screening and management. Availability of MgSO4 was low in multiple countries, though it was on the essential drug list of all surveyed countries. Country programs are encouraged to address gaps in screening and management of PE/E in ANC and L & D to contribute to lower maternal and perinatal mortality.

Keywords: Antenatal care; Eclampsia; Ethiopia; Kenya; Labor and delivery; Mozambique; Pre-eclampsia; Quality of care; Rwanda; Tanzania; Zanzibar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (IRB#00002549) as well as IRBs in each of the participating countries (Tanzania: National Institute of Medical Research [NIMR]; Zanzibar: Zanzibar Research Council [ZRC]; Kenya: Kenya Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board; Mozambique: Mozambican National Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health of Mozambique; Ethiopia: Ethiopian Public Health Association [EPHA]; Rwanda: Rwanda National Ethical Committee [RNEC]; Madagascar: Madagascar Ethical Committee, Ministry of Health of Mozambique). The MACRO International IRB also reviewed the Kenya study, since this was integrated into the national Service Provision Assessment (SPA) conducted by MEASURE DHS. As approved by the respective IRB’s, oral informed consent was obtained from study participants, and documented in data collection tools, prior to data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means and range of PE/E screening among ANC consultations by level of health facility (n = 2920)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Management of Severe PE/E Cases (n = 25)

References

    1. Duley L. The Global Impact of Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130–137. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bilano VL, Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A WHO secondary analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091198. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Safi Z, Imudia AN, Filetti LC, Hobson DT, Bahado-Singh RO, Awonuga AO. Delayed Postpartum Preeclampsia and Eclampsia Demographics, Clinical Course, and Complications. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1102–1107. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231934c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO. WHO recommendations for Prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: Geneva Switzerland; 2011. - PubMed

Publication types