Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;63(6):701-708.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Texting/Emailing While Driving Among High School Students in 35 States, United States, 2015

Li Li  1 , Ruth A Shults  2 , Rebecca R Andridge  3 , Merissa A Yellman  4 , Henry Xiang  5 , Motao Zhu  6
Affiliations

Texting/Emailing While Driving Among High School Students in 35 States, United States, 2015

Li Li et al. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Determine the prevalence and explore individual- and state-level factors associated with texting/emailing while driving (TWD) among adolescent drivers in the United States.

Methods: Data from 35 states that administered the 2015 state Youth Risk Behavior Survey were analyzed. We used Poisson regression models with robust error variance to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for TWD.

Results: Among the 101,397 high school students aged ≥ 14 years who had driven a vehicle during the past 30 days, 38% reported TWD at least once. TWD prevalence ranged from 26% in Maryland to 64% in South Dakota. TWD prevalence was higher in states with a lower minimum learner's permit age and in states where a larger percentage of students drove. Multivariable analyses revealed that the likelihood of TWD increased substantially with age, and white students were more likely to engage in TWD than students of all other races/ethnicities. Infrequent seatbelt users were 21% more likely to engage in TWD compared with frequent seatbelt users (adjusted PR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.26), and students who reported drinking and driving were almost twice as likely to TWD as compared to students who did not (adjusted PR = 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.79-2.04).

Conclusions: Prevalence of TWD among US high school students varied by more than two-fold across states. TWD prevalence was higher in states with lower minimum learner's permit ages and in states where a larger percentage of students drove. Older age, white race/ethnicity, and other risky driving behaviors were associated with TWD.

Keywords: Adolescent; Cellphone use; Distracted driving; Minimum learner's permit age; Teen driving; Texting while driving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Texting or emailing while driving among high school students aged ≥14 years, 35 states, state YRBS, US 2015. Notes: YRBS = Youth Risk Behavior Survey. TWD percent: Percentage of students that reported texting/emailing while driving at least once during the 30 days before the survey (among students who drove).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Texting or emailing while driving among high school students aged ≥14 years by state’s minimum learner’s permit age, 35 states, state YRBS, US 2015. Notes:YRBS = Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Percentage of texting while driving: Percentage of students that reported texting/emailing while driving at least once during the 30 days before the survey (among students who drove).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Eyes Forward.
    Simons-Morton B, Gershon P. Simons-Morton B, et al. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Dec;63(6):667-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.012. J Adolesc Health. 2018. PMID: 30454727 No abstract available.

References

    1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Distracted driving. 2017. Available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/distracted-driving. Accessed April 22, 2018.
    1. Klauer SG, Guo F, Simons-Morton BG, et al. Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. N Engl J Med 2014;370:54–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Engl J Med 1997;336:453–8. - PubMed
    1. Wilson FA, Stimpson JP. Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. Am J Public Health 2010;100:2213–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen S, Neyens DM. Assessing drivers’ response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks. J Safety Res 2017;61:149–55. - PubMed

Publication types