Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 30;16(3):262-269.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.07.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.

The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Affiliations
Review

The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Hartwig Schwaibold et al. Arab J Urol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has become a widely used technology in urology. Urological procedures that are now being routinely performed robotically are: radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy (RC), renal procedures - mainly partial nephrectomy (PN), and pyeloplasty, as well as ureteric re-implantation and adrenalectomy.

Methods: This non-systematic review of the literature examines the effectiveness of RALS compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for the most relevant urological procedures.

Results: For robot-assisted RP there seems to be an advantage in terms of continence and potency over laparoscopy. Robot-assisted RC seems equal in terms of oncological outcome but with lower complication rates; however, the effect of intracorporeal urinary diversion has hardly been examined. Robotic PN has proven safe and is most likely superior to conventional laparoscopy, whereas there does not seem to be a real advantage for the robot in radical nephrectomy. For reconstructive procedures, e.g. pyeloplasty and ureteric re-implantation, there seems to be advantages in terms of operating time.

Conclusions: We found substantial, albeit mostly low-quality evidence, that robotic operations can have better outcomes than procedures performed laparoscopically. However, in light of the significant costs and because high-quality data from prospective randomised trials are still missing, conventional urological laparoscopy is certainly not 'dead' yet.

Keywords: (RA)PN, (robot-assisted) partial nephrectomy; (RA)RN, (robot-assisted) radical nephrectomy; (RA)RP, (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; (RA-)RPLND, (robot-assisted) retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RA)RC, (robot-assisted) radical cystectomy; 3D, three-dimensional; EAU, European Association of Urology; ICG, indocyanine green; IVC, inferior vena cava; Laparoscopic; NSGCT, non-seminomatous germ cell tumour; PSM, positive surgical margin; RAIL, robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy; RALS, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery; RALUR, robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteric re-implantation; Robotic; Robotic urological surgery; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; WIT, warm ischaemia time; dVSS, da Vinci Surgical System.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yaxley J.W., Coughlin G.D., Chambers S.K., Occhipinti S., Samaratunga H., Zajdlewicz L. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388:1057–1066. - PubMed
    1. Hu J.C., Gu X., Lipsitz S.R., Barry M.J., D'Amico A.V., Weinberg A.C. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302:1557–1564. - PubMed
    1. Yossepowitch O., Briganti A., Eastham J.A., Epstein J., Graefen M., Montironi R. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol. 2014;65:303–313. - PubMed
    1. Montorsi F., Wilson T.G., Rosen R.C., Ahlering T.E., Artibani W., Carroll P.R. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62:368–381. - PubMed
    1. Ploussard G., de la Taille A., Moulin M., Vordos D., Hoznek A., Abbou C.C. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2014;65:610–619. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources