Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 2;16(3):357-364.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.004. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review

Philippe F Müller  1 , Daniel Schlager  1 , Simon Hein  1 , Christian Bach  2 , Arkadiusz Miernik  1 , Dominik S Schoeb  1
Affiliations
Review

Robotic stone surgery - Current state and future prospects: A systematic review

Philippe F Müller et al. Arab J Urol. .

Abstract

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of robot-assisted surgery in urolithiasis and to consider the future prospects of robotic approaches in stone surgery.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic PubMed© literature search using predefined Medical Subject Headings search terms to identify PubMed-listed clinical research studies on robotic stone surgery. All authors screened the results for eligibility and two independent reviewers performed the data extraction.

Results: The most common approach in robotic stone surgery is a robot-assisted pyelolithotomy using the da Vinci™ system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Several studies show this technique to be comparable to classic laparoscopic and open surgical interventions. One study that focused on ureteric stones showed a similar result. In recent years, promising data on robotic intrarenal surgery have been reported (Roboflex Avicenna™; Elmed Medical Systems, Ankara, Turkey). Initial studies have shown its feasibility and high stone-free rates and prove that this novel endoscopic approach is safe for the patient and comfortable for the surgeon.

Conclusions: The benefits of robotic devices in stone surgery in existing endourological, laparoscopic, and open treatment strategies still need elucidation. Although recent data are promising, more prospective randomised controlled studies are necessary to clarify the impact of this technique on patient safety and stone-free rates.

Keywords: (f)URS, (flexible) ureterorenoscopy; EAU, European Association of Urology; ESUT, European section of Uro-Technology; EULIS, EAU Section of Urolithiasis; Endourology; Nephrolithiasis; PCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy; RIRS, retrograde intrarenal surgery; Robotic stone surgery; SFR, stone-free rate; SWL, shockwave lithotripsy; Stone disease; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Review of the literature – search terms.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Selection of included studies – adopted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) algorithm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bartoletti R., Cai T., Mondaini N., Melone F., Travaglini F., Carini M. Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis. Urol Int. 2007;79(Suppl. 1):3–7. - PubMed
    1. Amato M., Lusini M.L., Nelli F. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis today. Urol Int. 2004;72(Suppl. 1):1–5. - PubMed
    1. López M., Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:49–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah J., Whitfield H.N. Urolithiasis through the ages. BJU Int. 2002;89:801–810. - PubMed
    1. Curhan G.C. Dietary calcium, dietary protein, and kidney stone formation. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1997;23:261–264. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources