Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May:2018:2-9.
doi: 10.1145/3194696.3194705.

Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance

Affiliations

Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance

George S Avrunin et al. Softw Eng Healthc Syst SEHS IEEE ACM Int Workshop. 2018 May.

Abstract

This paper summarizes the accomplishments and recent directions of our medical safety project. Our process-based approach uses a detailed, rigorously-defined, and carefully validated process model to provide a dynamically updated, context-aware and thus, "Smart" Checklist to help process performers understand and manage their pending tasks [7]. This paper focuses on support for teams of performers, working independently as well as in close collaboration, in stressful situations that are life critical. Our recent work has three main thrusts: provide effective real-time guidance for closely collaborating teams; develop and evaluate techniques for measuring cognitive load based on biometric observations and human surveys; and, using these measurements plus analysis and discrete event process simulation, predict cognitive load throughout the process model and propose process modifications to help performers better manage high cognitive load situations. This project is a collaboration among software engineers, surgical team members, human factors researchers, and medical equipment instrumentation experts. Experimental prototype capabilities are being built and evaluated based upon process models of two cardiovascular surgery processes, Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). In this paper we describe our approach for each of the three research thrusts by illustrating our work for heparinization, a common subprocess of both AVR and CABG. Heparinization is a high-risk error-prone procedure that involves complex team interactions and thus highlights the importance of this work for improving patient outcomes.

Keywords: Process modeling; augmented cognition; checklists; cognitive load; simulation; surgical data science; surgical patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multi-Team Smart Checklist to guide the Anesthesiology, Perfusion, and Surgery subteams through the Perform isolated CABG process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Updates to the Multi-Team Smart Checklist after the Perfusion team completes step Confirm target ACT achieved and reports that the problem Low ACT needs to be addressed

References

    1. Arney David, Goldman Julian M, Whitehead Susan F, Lee Insup. Improving Patient Safety with X-Ray and Anesthesia Machine Ventilator Synchronization: A Medical Device Interoperability Case Study. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2010. pp. 96–109.
    1. Arney Dave, Plourde Jeff, Goldman Julian. OpenICE medical device interoperability platform overview and requirement analysis. Biomed. Eng./Biomedizinische Technik. 2018;63(1):39–48. (Feb. 2018) - PubMed
    1. ASTM International. ASTM F2761-2009. Medical Devices and Medical Systems—Essential Safety Requirements for Equipment Comprising the Patient-Centric Integrated Clinical Environment (ICE), Part 1: General Requirements and Conceptual Model 2009
    1. Avrunin George S, Clarke Lori A, Osterweil Leon J, Christov Stefan C, Chen Bin, Henneman Elizabeth A, Henneman Philip L, Cassells Lucinda, Mertens Wilson. Experience modeling and analyzing medical processes: UMass/Baystate medical safety project overview. Proc. of the 1st ACM Int. Health Inform. Symp. 2010:316–325.
    1. Boorman Daniel. Today’s electronic checklists reduce likelihood of crew errors and help prevent mishaps. International Civil Aviation Organization Journal. 2001;56(1):17–36. (2001)

LinkOut - more resources