Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance
- PMID: 30140792
- PMCID: PMC6103223
- DOI: 10.1145/3194696.3194705
Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance
Abstract
This paper summarizes the accomplishments and recent directions of our medical safety project. Our process-based approach uses a detailed, rigorously-defined, and carefully validated process model to provide a dynamically updated, context-aware and thus, "Smart" Checklist to help process performers understand and manage their pending tasks [7]. This paper focuses on support for teams of performers, working independently as well as in close collaboration, in stressful situations that are life critical. Our recent work has three main thrusts: provide effective real-time guidance for closely collaborating teams; develop and evaluate techniques for measuring cognitive load based on biometric observations and human surveys; and, using these measurements plus analysis and discrete event process simulation, predict cognitive load throughout the process model and propose process modifications to help performers better manage high cognitive load situations. This project is a collaboration among software engineers, surgical team members, human factors researchers, and medical equipment instrumentation experts. Experimental prototype capabilities are being built and evaluated based upon process models of two cardiovascular surgery processes, Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). In this paper we describe our approach for each of the three research thrusts by illustrating our work for heparinization, a common subprocess of both AVR and CABG. Heparinization is a high-risk error-prone procedure that involves complex team interactions and thus highlights the importance of this work for improving patient outcomes.
Keywords: Process modeling; augmented cognition; checklists; cognitive load; simulation; surgical data science; surgical patient safety.
Figures
References
-
- Arney David, Goldman Julian M, Whitehead Susan F, Lee Insup. Improving Patient Safety with X-Ray and Anesthesia Machine Ventilator Synchronization: A Medical Device Interoperability Case Study. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2010. pp. 96–109.
-
- Arney Dave, Plourde Jeff, Goldman Julian. OpenICE medical device interoperability platform overview and requirement analysis. Biomed. Eng./Biomedizinische Technik. 2018;63(1):39–48. (Feb. 2018) - PubMed
-
- ASTM International. ASTM F2761-2009. Medical Devices and Medical Systems—Essential Safety Requirements for Equipment Comprising the Patient-Centric Integrated Clinical Environment (ICE), Part 1: General Requirements and Conceptual Model 2009
-
- Avrunin George S, Clarke Lori A, Osterweil Leon J, Christov Stefan C, Chen Bin, Henneman Elizabeth A, Henneman Philip L, Cassells Lucinda, Mertens Wilson. Experience modeling and analyzing medical processes: UMass/Baystate medical safety project overview. Proc. of the 1st ACM Int. Health Inform. Symp. 2010:316–325.
-
- Boorman Daniel. Today’s electronic checklists reduce likelihood of crew errors and help prevent mishaps. International Civil Aviation Organization Journal. 2001;56(1):17–36. (2001)
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources