Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb;29(1):75-103.
doi: 10.1007/s10286-018-0558-3. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Does resistance training modulate cardiac autonomic control? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Does resistance training modulate cardiac autonomic control? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pooja Bhati et al. Clin Auton Res. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the literature on the effects of resistance training (RT) on cardiac autonomic control in healthy and diseased individuals.

Methods: Electronic databases Pubmed, PEDro, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception up to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental trials, and cross-over controlled trials investigating the effect of RT (of at least 4 weeks duration) on cardiac autonomic control assessed either by linear or non-linear measures of heart rate variability (HRV), baroreflex sensitivity, or post-exercise heart rate recovery were included. Of the studies retrieved, 28 were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on 21 studies of the total 28 studies.

Results: Quality and characteristic assessment revealed fair quality evidence. The majority of literature on healthy humans suggested no change in cardiac autonomic control following RT. Standardized mean differences (SMD) showed a significant effect of RT on root mean square of successive differences between adjacent inter-beat (R-R) intervals (RMSSD) [SMD 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-1.73; p = 0.01], ratio of low- to high-frequency power of HRV (LF/HF ratio; SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.42; p < 0.00001), standard deviation of the instantaneous beat-to-beat variability (SD1; SMD 1.78, 95% CI 1.07-2.49, p < 0.00001), and sample entropy (SMD 1.17, 95% CI 0.36-1.97, p = 0.005) in diseased individuals.

Conclusion: This rigorous systematic analysis revealed that RT has no or minimal effects on cardiac autonomic control of healthy individuals, but RT leads to improvement in cardiac autonomic control of diseased individuals.

Keywords: Autonomic control of heart; Exercise; Heart rate variability; Strength training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A (2007) Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1423–1434 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, Amsterdam EA, Bittner V, Franklin BA, Stewart KJ (2007) Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update. Circulation 116:572–584 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P (2002) Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93:1318–1326 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orr R, Raymond J, Singh MF (2008) Efficacy of progressive resistance training on balance performance in older adults. Sports Med 38:317–343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvehus M, Boman N, Söderlund K, Svensson MB, Burén J (2014) Metabolic adaptations in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and whole-body oxidative capacity in response to resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 114:1463–1471 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources