Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Mar:372:395-404.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016015.

Botulinum toxin prevents stimulus-induced backfiring produced by neostigmine in the mouse phrenic nerve-diaphragm

Botulinum toxin prevents stimulus-induced backfiring produced by neostigmine in the mouse phrenic nerve-diaphragm

E Aizenman et al. J Physiol. 1986 Mar.

Abstract

The origin of motor nerve antidromic activity (backfiring) induced by anticholinesterase treatment was examined in the mouse phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparation. Botulinum toxin was used to determine whether backfiring is due to (a) a direct effect of the cholinesterase inhibitor on the nerve terminal, or (b) an indirect effect via the prolongation of the action of acetylcholine. In previously untreated control preparations, neostigmine produced spontaneous and stimulus-induced antidromic activity in the phrenic nerve when rapidly introduced into the diaphragm via its vasculature. This activity could be reversibly blocked by d-tubocurarine and decamethonium, but not by atropine. Neostigmine-induced backfiring did not occur in preparations in which transmitter release was blocked with botulinum toxin. Infusion of a small bolus of a high concentration of acetylcholine following neostigmine treatment resulted in a short-term increase in the incidence of antidromic activity, followed by block, in both controls and botulinum toxin-treated preparations. It is concluded that transmitter release is necessary for the production of backfiring following cholinesterase inhibition since neostigmine alone does not elicit antidromic activity in botulinum toxin-treated preparations at concentrations which are effective in controls. Our results support the hypothesis that the effects of neostigmine on the motoneurone terminal are mediated by the prolonged action of acetylcholine that occurs with inhibition of acetylcholinesterase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Science. 1976 Sep 24;193(4259):1256-8 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:130-48 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969 Apr;166(2):217-24 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553-9 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res. 1983 Feb 14;261(1):172-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources