Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Aug;97(34):e11873.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011873.

Clinical diagnosis for dusk phenomenon of diabetes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Clinical diagnosis for dusk phenomenon of diabetes

Sina Du et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug.

Abstract

The diabetes dusk phenomenon (spontaneous and transient pre-dinner hyperglycemia) anecdotally exists but has not been investigated.A total of 80 diabetic patients that received continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions were retrospectively studied. They were grouped into a routine group (R) (consecutive δDG [dusk blood glucose difference] <0 mmol/L) and a classic dusk phenomenon group (CDP, consecutive δDG≥0 mmol/L). δDG represents differences in blood glucose measurements between pre-dinner and post-lunch (δDG: dusk blood glucose difference). Other patients were placed in a suspicious group (S). The suspicious group was further divided into 3 groups based on the frequency at which the δDG occurred: suspicious 1 group (S1), δDG≥0 mmol/L occurred once only; suspicious 3 group (S3), δDG < 0 mmol/L occurred once only, and the remaining patients were grouped in the suspicious 2 group (S2).We identified the CDP and S3 groups as the "clinical dusk phenomenon" group (CLDP). We confirmed that the S1 and R groups to be in the "clinical routine" group. The S2 group was significantly different from the CDP group. In addition, the S2 group had significant differences in δDG measurements and post-lunch blood glucose values compared with the R group, but no differences in other parameters were seen. Multiple comparisons with the other suspicious groups also showed no statistical difference in many parameters. Thus, we placed these patients into the "suspicious clinical dusk phenomenon" group (SDP). The δDG cut-off for the CLDP group was 1.0167 mmol/L. The pre-dinner-pre-lunch blood glucose cut-off for this group was 2.72 mmol/L. The δDG cut-off for the SDP group was -0.95 mmol/L. The pre-dinner-pre-lunch blood glucose cut-off for this group was 0.87 mmol/L. The cut-off points for the post-dinner-post-lunch blood glucose measurements in the CLDP and SDP groups were both 1.2667 mmol/L.A consecutive δDG≥0 or a once only δDG < 0 could be diagnosed as falling into the CLDP group. The CLDP could be excluded when a consecutive δDG < 0 or a once only δDG≥0 was found. Patients falling into other categories were placed into the SDP group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest exist in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. We would like to declare on behalf of co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Line chart showing the average blood glucose value in each group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar chart showing the average blood glucose difference (bar Chart of the δDG ratios) δDG (pre-dinner-post-lunch blood glucose). δDG = (dusk blood glucose difference).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bar chart showing the average blood glucose difference (bar chart of the pre-dinner-pre-lunch blood glucose).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bar chart showing the average blood glucose difference (bar chart of the post-dinner-post-lunch blood glucose).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Best cut-off value of dusk phenomenon. The ROC curve of the diabetic clinical dusk phenomenon (CLDP). CLDP = clinical dusk phenomenon, ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ROC curves of the diabetic suspicious clinical dusk phenomenon (SDP). ROC = receiver operating characteristic, SDP = suspicious clinical dusk phenomenon.

References

    1. Wei Li. Spontaneous and transient pre-dinner hyperglycemia in some patients with diabetes dusk phenomenon. Medicine 2016;95:e5440. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas, Danne Current practice of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents the Hannover recipe. Pediatr Diabetes 2006;7(suppl 4):25–31. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt MI, Hadji-Georgopoulos A, Rendell M, et al. The dawn phenomenon, an early morning glucose rise: Implications for diabetic intraday blood glucose variation. Diabetes Care 1981;4:579–85. - PubMed
    1. Porcellati F, Lucidi P, Bolli GB, et al. Thirty years of research on the dawn phenomenon: lessons to optimize blood glucose control in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3860–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monnier L, Colette C, Dejager S, et al. Magnitude of the dawn phenomenon and its impact on the overall glucose exposure in type 2 diabetes: is this of concern? Diabetes Care 2013;36:4057–62. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types