Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;12(6):1019-1035.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0472-y. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

Strong sustainability in coastal areas: a conceptual interpretation of SDG 14

Barbara Neumann  1 , Konrad Ott  2 , Richard Kenchington  3
Affiliations

Strong sustainability in coastal areas: a conceptual interpretation of SDG 14

Barbara Neumann et al. Sustain Sci. 2017.

Abstract

Humans derive many tangible and intangible benefits from coastal areas, providing essential components for social and economic development especially of less developed coastal states and island states. At the same time, growing human and environmental pressures in coastal areas have significant impacts on coastal systems, requiring urgent attention in many coastal areas globally. Sustainable development goal (SDG) 14 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (henceforth the 2030 Agenda) aims for conservation and sustainable use of the oceans, seas, and marine resources, explicitly considering coastal areas in two of its targets (14.2 and 14.5). These promote, as we argue in this article, a strong sustainability concept by addressing protection, conservation, and management of coastal ecosystems and resources. The 2030 Agenda adopts the so-called "three-pillar-model" but does not specify how to balance the economic, social, and environmental dimensions in cases of trade-offs or conflicts. By analysing SDG 14 for the underlying sustainability concept, we derive decisive arguments for a strong sustainability concept and for the integration of constraint functions to avoid depletion of natural capital of coastal areas beyond safe minimum standards. In potential negotiations, targets 14.2 and 14.5 ought to serve as constraints to such depletion. However, such a rule-based framework has challenges and pitfalls which need to be addressed in the implementation and policy process. We discuss these for coastal areas in the context of SDG 14 and provide recommendations for coastal governance and for the process ahead.

Keywords: Coastal governance; Coastal zones; Conservation; Natural capital; Sustainability; Sustainable development goals (SDGs).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agardy T, Bridgewater P, Crosby MP, Day J, Dayton PK, Kenchington R, Laffoley D, McConney P, Murray PA, Parks JE, Peau L. Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2003;13(4):353–367. doi: 10.1002/aqc.583. - DOI
    1. Agardy T, Alder J, Dayton P, Curran S, Kitchingman A, Wilson M, Catenazzi A, Restrepo J, Birkeland C, Blaber S, Saifullah S, Branch G, Boersma D, Nixon S, Dugan P, Davidson N, Vörösmarty C. Coastal systems. In: Reid W, editor. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystems & human well-being, volume 1: current state and trends. Washington: Island Press; 2005. pp. 513–549.
    1. Agardy T, Claudet J, Day JC. ‘Dangerous Targets’ revisited: old dangers in new contexts plague marine protected areas. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2016;26:7–23. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2675. - DOI
    1. Asheim GB (2007) Justifying, characterizing, and indicating sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht
    1. Atkinson G, Dubourg R, Hamilton K, Munasinghe M, Pearce D, Young C. Measuring sustainable development: macroeconomics and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1997.

LinkOut - more resources