Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;142(3):759-768.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004650.

Salvaging the Unavoidable: A Review of Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion

Affiliations

Salvaging the Unavoidable: A Review of Complications in Pediatric Tissue Expansion

Arun K Gosain et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Tissue expansion, while a mainstay of reconstruction for pediatric cutaneous lesions, has significant complication rates. The authors review the complications in a single-surgeon series of tissue expansion to identify risk factors for complications and guide subsequent therapy so that reconstructive goals in patients can be met irrespective of intervening complications.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all pediatric patients who underwent tissue expansion performed by the senior author (A.K.G.) over a 12-year period. In total, 282 expanders were placed in 94 patients.

Results: A total of 65 complications occurred in 39 of 94 patients (41.5 percent), involving 65 of the 282 expanders (23.0 percent) placed. Major complications that required expander removal included exposure (n = 11), rupture (n = 15), and migration (n = 11). The most frequent minor complications, which did not require immediate expander removal, included migration (n = 13) and port malfunction (n = 9). The majority of expanders were placed in the scalp (n = 114), followed by the torso (n = 100), face and neck (n = 52), and the extremities (n = 16). Serial expansion beyond the second round resulted in a marked increase in complications. Despite complications, tissue expansion in the majority of patients could be salvaged, and a satisfactory outcome was achieved.

Conclusions: Families must be made aware that approximately one-third of patients may have a complication requiring additional surgery or modification of the initial reconstructive plan. However, these complications need not preclude attainment of reconstructive goals.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argenta LC, Marks MW, Pasyk KA. Advances in tissue expansion. Clin Plast Surg. 1985;12:159171.
    1. Vander Kolk CA, McCann JJ, Knight KR, O’Brien BM. Some further characteristics of expanded tissue. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14:447453.
    1. LoGiudice J, Gosain AK. Pediatric tissue expansion: Indications and complications. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:866872.
    1. Elias DL, Baird WL, Zubowicz VN. Applications and complications of tissue expansion in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26:1521.
    1. Gibstein LA, Abramson DL, Bartlett RA, Orgill DP, Upton J, Mulliken JB. Tissue expansion in children: A retrospective study of complications. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:358364.