Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video)
- PMID: 30148992
- PMCID: PMC6748329
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.033
Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video)
Abstract
Background and aims: Residual fluid within endoscope working channels after reprocessing may promote growth of pathogens. Current reprocessing guidelines therefore recommend endoscope drying with administration of forced filtered air; however, the duration and modality of administered air are not specified. The new DriScope Aid device enables automated administration of filtered air at controlled pressure through all internal endoscope channels. We systematically compared, for the first time, the impact of manual drying and automated drying on retained working channel fluid and bioburden after reprocessing.
Methods: We assessed for residual working channel fluid after reprocessing and/or drying by using the SteriCam borescope. Drying was performed either manually (forced filtered air) or was automated (DriScope Aid) for either 5 or 10 minutes. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence testing was performed on working channel rinsates after drying, to evaluate for residual bioburden.
Results: Significantly more fluid droplets were evident after manual drying (4.55 ± 6.14) than with automated device-facilitated drying for either 5 minutes (0.83 ± 1.29; P = .007) or 10 minutes (0 ± 0; P = .001). ATP bioluminescence values were higher for manual drying compared with automated drying at 48 hours (P = .001) and 72 hours (P = .014) after reprocessing.
Conclusions: We demonstrate significantly fewer water droplets and delayed ATP bioluminescence values within endoscope working channels after automated drying compared with manual drying. In particular, virtually no retained fluid was evident within endoscope working channels after automated drying for 10 minutes. These findings support recommendations for automation of as many reprocessing steps as possible. Automated drying may decrease the risk of transmission of infection related to endoscopy.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Comment in
-
Innocent bystanders or legitimate culprits? The role of moisture and simethicone in endoscopically transmitted infections.Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):133-136. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.034. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30567673 No abstract available.
References
-
- Alfa MJ, Sitter DL. In-hospital evaluation of contamination of duodenoscopes: a quantitative assessment of the effect of drying. J Hosp Infect 1991;19:89–98. - PubMed
-
- Kovaleva J Infectious complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy and their prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016;30:689–704. - PubMed
-
- Kovaleva J Endoscope drying and its pitfalls. J Hosp Infect. Epub 2017 Jul 17. - PubMed
-
- Reprocessing Guideline Task Force; Petersen BT, Cohen J, Hambrick RD 3rd, et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:282–94 - PubMed
-
- Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Eiland JE, et al. Assessing residual contamination and damage inside flexible endoscopes over time. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1675–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
