Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 29:2018:4560718.
doi: 10.1155/2018/4560718. eCollection 2018.

A Proposal for an Intermediate Care Unit-Quality Measurement Framework

Affiliations

A Proposal for an Intermediate Care Unit-Quality Measurement Framework

Joost D J Plate et al. Crit Care Res Pract. .

Abstract

Rationale, Aims, and Objectives. The Intermediate Care Unit (IMCU) is a hospital unit which is logistically situated between the hospital ward and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). There is debate regarding the value of the IMCU. Understanding its value is compromised by the lack of adequate quality indicators. Therefore, this study identifies currently used IMCU indicators and evaluates their usefulness. Methods. Through a systematic literature search, currently used quality indicators were identified and evaluated for their importance using a proposed IMCU-specific quality measurement framework. Results. From 4034 titles and abstracts, 168 articles were selected for full-text review. Of these, 22 articles were included, which reported IMCU quality at the level of the IMCU (n = 12), the ICU (n = 5), both IMCU and ICU (n = 3) or hospital level (n = 2). At the IMCU, the IMCU mortality (n = 16), discharge-to-ICU rate (n = 7), in-hospital IMCU mortality (n = 7), and length of stay (n = 6) were most frequently reported. Three studies compared the effect of different structures of the IMCU on its utilization or hospital outcome. Conclusions. Current focus in IMCU quality research is towards measuring quality at the IMCU itself. Since the influence of the structure of IMCUs on its utilization and its effects on hospital outcome are only rarely investigated, attention should shift towards these important issues in further research. The proposed IMCU quality measurement framework can thereby serve as a helpful tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Proposed Intermediate Care Unit-Quality Measurement Framework. This figure shows—on the left side—the different approaches to the assessment of the quality of care, as described by Donabedian [10]. It also shows—on the top side—the geographical location (level) at which these are measured. The solid arrows show relationships between the approaches to assessment of the quality of care, while the dashed arrows depict the relationships between quality categories on different geographical locations. From this framework, it follows that quality measurement of the IMCU is closely related to other parts of the hospital.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram for study selection [13].
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Currently Reported Quality Indicators and their position in the Proposed Intermediate Care Unit-Quality Measurement Framework. In this figure, the numbers in the boxes represent the frequencies of reporting of quality indicators and their position in the proposed intermediate care unit-quality measurement framework (Figure 1). The numbers in the grey boxes represent the numbers of comparative studies reporting on the relationship (the black arrows) between boxes and reported how a change in one box affected the other one.

References

    1. Plate J. D. J., Leenen L. P. H., Houwert M., Hietbrink F. Utilisation of intermediate care units: a systematic review. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2017;2017:10. doi: 10.1155/2017/8038460.8038460 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franklin C., Rackow E., Mamdani M., et al. Decreases in mortality on a large urban medical service by facilitating access to critical care. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1988;148(6):1403–1405. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1988.00380060167029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent J. L., Rubenfeld G. D. Does intermediate care improve patient outcomes or reduce costs? Critical Care. 2015;19(1):p. 89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0813-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sjoding M. W., Valley T. S., Prescott H. C., et al. Rising billing for intermediate intensive care among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries between 1996 and 2010. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2016;193(2):163–170. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1252OC. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prin M., Wunsch H. The role of stepdown beds in hospital care. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2014;190(11):1210–1216. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201406-1117PP. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources