Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct;59(8):672-686.
doi: 10.1002/em.22215. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

Somatic mutation load and spectra: A record of DNA damage and repair in healthy human cells

Affiliations
Review

Somatic mutation load and spectra: A record of DNA damage and repair in healthy human cells

Natalie Saini et al. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Somatic genome instability is a hallmark of cancer genomes and has been linked to aging and a variety of other pathologies. Large-scale cancer genome and exome sequencing have revealed that mutation load and spectra in cancers can be influenced by environmental exposures, the anatomical site of exposures, and tissue type. There is now an abundance of data favoring the hypothesis that a substantial portion of the mutations in cancers originate prior to carcinogenesis in stem cells of the healthy individual. Rapid advances in sequencing of noncancer cells from healthy humans have shown that their mutation loads and spectra resemble cancer data. Similar to cancer genomes, mutation profiles of healthy cells show marked intra-individual variation, thus providing a metric of the various factors-environmental and endogenous-involved in mutagenesis in these individuals. This review focuses on the current methodologies to measure mutation loads and to determine mutation signatures for evaluating the environmental and endogenous sources of DNA damage in human somatic cells. We anticipate that in future, such large-scale studies aimed at exploring the landscapes of somatic mutations across different cell types in healthy people would provide a valuable resource for designing personalized preventative strategies against diseases associated with somatic genome instability. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:672-686, 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Keywords: genome-wide mutation rate; human somatic mutations; mutation signatures; next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the methods for detecting somatic mutations in healthy human cells
The various approaches to analyze somatic mutations in a heterogenous tissue sample are depicted using skin as an example. The colored circles (red, cyan, yellow and green) in the tissue denote nuclei within the cells with different somatic mutations respectively. The dark blue circles denote nuclei with germline polymorphisms present across all cells in the tissue. DNA extraction from the bulk cells followed by deep sequencing provides a measure of the diverse somatic mutations present in the sample (left panel). The gray lines denote individual reads in NGS, and the colored circles on them imply heterozygous somatic mutations or germline polymorphisms present in the tissue. The somatic mutations in bulk sequencing samples are often present in very low allele fractions. In addition, sequencing errors (crosses) may further confound analysis in deep-sequenced heterogenous samples. To determine the somatic mutations in a given cell whole genome amplification from a single cell followed by WGS may be used (middle panel). On the other hand, pluripotent stem cells may be derived from the tissue and grown clonally to get enough number of cells for WGS. The primary cells may also be either cultured directly, or organoid cultures may be established from the stem cells within the tissue allowing propagation in vitro to obtain DNA for WGS (right panel). In single cell sequencing, and clonal population sequencing somatic mutations are present as high frequency alleles, while errors generated during library preparation and sequencing are usually present in a smaller fraction of reads. Therefore, somatic mutation calling using these approaches is more accurate.

References

    1. Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, Leach FS, Sistonen P, Pylkkanen L, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Powell SM, Jen J, Hamilton SR, et al. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science. 1993;260:812–816. - PubMed
    1. Abyzov A, Mariani J, Palejev D, Zhang Y, Haney MS, Tomasini L, Ferrandino AF, Rosenberg Belmaker LA, Szekely A, Wilson M, et al. Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2012;492:438–442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abyzov A, Tomasini L, Zhou B, Vasmatzis N, Coppola G, Amenduni M, Pattni R, Wilson M, Gerstein M, Weissman S, et al. One thousand somatic SNVs per skin fibroblast cell set baseline of mosaic mutational load with patterns that suggest proliferative origin. Genome Res. 2017;27:512–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexandrov LB, Jones PH, Wedge DC, Sale JE, Campbell PJ, Nik-Zainal S, Stratton MR. Clock-like mutational processes in human somatic cells. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1402–1407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, Bignell GR, Bolli N, Borg A, Borresen-Dale AL, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–421. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources