Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0199347.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199347. eCollection 2018.

Long-term use of carvedilol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term use of carvedilol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Hiroki Watanabe et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Despite its recommendation by the current guidelines, the role of long-term oral beta-blocker therapy has never been evaluated by randomized trials in uncomplicated ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction or ventricular arrhythmia who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods and results: In a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, STEMI patients with successful primary PCI within 24 hours from the onset and with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% were randomly assigned in a 1-to-1 fashion either to the carvedilol group or to the no beta-blocker group within 7 days after primary PCI. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. Between August 2010 and May 2014, 801 patients were randomly assigned to the carvedilol group (N = 399) or the no beta-blocker group (N = 402) at 67 centers in Japan. The carvedilol dose was up-titrated from 3.4±2.1 mg at baseline to 6.3±4.3 mg at 1-year. During median follow-up of 3.9 years with 96.4% follow-up, the cumulative 3-year incidences of both the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the carvedilol and no beta-blocker groups (6.8% and 7.9%, P = 0.20, and 20.3% and 17.7%, P = 0.65, respectively). There also was no significant difference in LVEF at 1-year between the 2 groups (60.9±8.4% and 59.6±8.8%, P = 0.06).

Conclusion: Long-term carvedilol therapy added on the contemporary evidence-based medications did not seem beneficial in selected STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.

Trial registration: CAPITAL-RCT (Carvedilol Post-Intervention Long-Term Administration in Large-scale Randomized Controlled Trial) ClinicalTrials.gov.number, NCT 01155635.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01155635.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flow chart.
ITT = intention-to-treat; IQR = interquartile range.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Dose of carvedilol at each follow-up.
Among 394 patients in the carvedilol group, 12 patients did not receive the assigned carvedilol treatment; prescription of bisoprolol in 7 patients and no prescription of beta-blocker in 5 patients (protocol violation).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Comparison of LVEF between the carvedilol group and the no beta-blocker group at baseline, at 3-month follow-up, and at 1-year follow-up.
LVEF data was missing in 6 patients (4 patients in the carvedilol group and 2 patients in the no beta-blocker group). IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Kaplan-Meier curves for the primary endpoint (a composite of death, MI, hospitalization for ACS, or hospitalization for HF) (A), for all-cause death (B).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Kaplan-Meier curves for any coronary revascularization (A), and for a secondary composite endpoint (a composite of death, MI, stroke, hospitalization for ACS, hospitalization for HF or any coronary revascularization) (B).
MI = myocardial infarction; ACS = acute coronary syndrome; HF = heart failure.

References

    1. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Furberg CD. Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1993;270: 1589–95. - PubMed
    1. Dargie HJ. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357: 1385–1390. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04560-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, De Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of st-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61: 78–140. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33: 2569–2619. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang JH, Hahn J-Y, Song Y Bin, Choi S-H, Choi J-H, Lee SH, et al. Association of Beta-Blocker Therapy at Discharge With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Elsevier Inc; 2014;7: 592–601. 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.206 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data