Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019;26(5):529-535.
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0091. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study

Jolanta Majer et al. Cardiol J. 2019.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of chest compressions (CCs) carried out with and without the use of the TrueCPR device during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitations conducted by trainee doctors.

Methods: The study was a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. The study involved 65 trainee doctors who were tasked with performing a 2-min cycle of uninterrupted CCs under conditions of a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults. CC were carried out in two scenarios: with and without TrueCPR chest compression support. Participants did not have experience in the use of CCs prior to this study.

Results: The depth of compressions in regard to CC techniques were varied by 45 mm (IQR 43-48) for manual CC and 53 mm (IQR 51-55) for the TrueCPR device (p < 0.001). The incidence of CCs with and without TrueCPR was: 112 (IQR 103-113) vs. 129 (IQR 122-135) compressions (p = 0.002). The degree of complete chest relaxation with the TrueCPR device was 95% (IQR 76-99) and without the device, 33% (IQR 29-38) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In the simulation study performed, the use of the TrueCPR device resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of CCs in relation to frequency and depth of CCs and correctness of chest relaxation.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; chest compressions; doctor; medical simulation; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TrueCPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Randomization flow chart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median chest compression (CC) depth.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median chest compression (CC) rate.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Degree of chest compression (CC) relaxation.

References

    1. Kempa M, Królak T, Drelich Ł, et al. Pre-discharge defibrillation testing: Is it still justified? Cardiol J. 2016;23(5):532–538. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freund B, Kaplan PW. A review of the utility of a hypothermia protocol in cardiac arrests due to non-shockable rhythms. Cardiol J. 2017;24(3):324–333. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015;95:1–80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S444–S464. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S414–S435. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types