LVAD Pump Flow Does Not Adequately Increase With Exercise
- PMID: 30155903
- PMCID: PMC6589923
- DOI: 10.1111/aor.13349
LVAD Pump Flow Does Not Adequately Increase With Exercise
Abstract
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) restore cardiovascular circulatory demand at rest with a spontaneous increase in pump flow to exercise. The relevant contribution of cardiac output provided by the LVAD and ejected through the aortic valve for exercises of different intensities has been barely investigated in patients. The hypothesis of this study was that different responses in continuous recorded pump parameters occur for maximal and submaximal intensity exercises and that the pump flow change has an impact on the oxygen uptake at peak exercise (pVO2 ). Cardiac and pump parameters such as LVAD flow rate (QLVAD ), heart rate (HR), and aortic valve (AV) opening were analyzed from continuously recorded LVAD data during physical exercises of maximal (bicycle ergometer test) and submaximal intensities (6-min walk test and regular trainings). During all exercise sessions, the LVAD speed was kept constant. Cardiac and pump parameter responses of 16 patients for maximal and submaximal intensity exercises were similar for QLVAD : +0.89 ± 0.52 versus +0.59 ± 0.38 L/min (P = 0.07) and different for HR: +20.4 ± 15.4 versus +7.7 ± 5.8 bpm (P < 0.0001) and AV-opening with 71% versus 23% of patients (P < 0.0001). Multi-regression analysis with pVO2 (R2 = 0.77) showed relation to workload normalized by bodyweight (P = 0.0002), HR response (P = 0.001), AV-opening (P = 0.02), and age (P = 0.06) whereas the change in QLVAD was irrelevant. Constant speed LVADs provide inadequate support for maximum intensity exercises. AV-opening and improvements in HR show an important role for higher exercise capacities and reflect exercise intensities. Changes in pump flow do not impact pVO2 and are independent of AV-opening and response in HR. An LVAD speed control may lead to adequate left ventricular support during strenuous physical activities.
Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiac response; Exercise; Left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support.
© 2018 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.
Figures
References
-
- Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000‐patient database. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014;33:555–64. - PubMed
-
- Pinney SP, Anyanwu AC, Lala A, Teuteberg JJ, Uriel N, Mehra MR. Left ventricular assist devices for lifelong support. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2845–61. - PubMed
-
- Salzberg SP, Lachat ML, vonHarbou K, Zünd G, Turina MI. Normalization of high pulmonary vascular resistance with LVAD support in heart transplantation candidates? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:222–5. - PubMed
-
- Rogers JG, Aaronson KD, Boyle AJ, et al. Continuous flow left ventricular assist device improves functional capacity and quality of life of advanced heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(17):1826–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical