Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203117.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203117. eCollection 2018.

Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research

Affiliations

Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research

Cristina M Pulido et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The social impact of research has usually been analysed through the scientific outcomes produced under the auspices of the research. The growth of scholarly content in social media and the use of altmetrics by researchers to track their work facilitate the advancement in evaluating the impact of research. However, there is a gap in the identification of evidence of the social impact in terms of what citizens are sharing on their social media platforms. This article applies a social impact in social media methodology (SISM) to identify quantitative and qualitative evidence of the potential or real social impact of research shared on social media, specifically on Twitter and Facebook. We define the social impact coverage ratio (SICOR) to identify the percentage of tweets and Facebook posts providing information about potential or actual social impact in relation to the total amount of social media data found related to specific research projects. We selected 10 projects in different fields of knowledge to calculate the SICOR, and the results indicate that 0.43% of the tweets and Facebook posts collected provide linkages with information about social impact. However, our analysis indicates that some projects have a high percentage (4.98%) and others have no evidence of social impact shared in social media. Examples of quantitative and qualitative evidence of social impact are provided to illustrate these results. A general finding is that novel evidences of social impact of research can be found in social media, becoming relevant platforms for scientists to spread quantitative and qualitative evidence of social impact in social media to capture the interest of citizens. Thus, social media users are showed to be intermediaries making visible and assessing evidence of social impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Poppy G. Science must prepare for social impact. Nature. 2015; 526 (7571): 7 10.1038/526007a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 2013; 64(2), 217–233.
    1. Reale E, Avramov D, Canhial K, Donovan C, Flecha R, Holm P, et al. A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research. Research Evaluation. 2017; rvx025: 1–11. 10.1093/reseval/rvx025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helming K, Diehl K, Kuhlman T, Jansson T, Verburg PH, Bakker M, et al. Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use, Part B: application of the analytical framework. Ecology and Society. 2011; 16(1): 29.
    1. Wilder L, Walpole M. Measuring social impacts in conservation: experience of using the Most Significant Change method. Oryx. 2008; 42(4): 529–538. 10.1017/S0030605307000671 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources