Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;21(18):3422-3430.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002100. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda

Alice Fabbri  1 , Taylor J Holland  2 , Lisa A Bero  2
Affiliations

Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda

Alice Fabbri et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify scientific publications that result from food industry-funded projects on human health and to characterize their research topics to assess the potential for bias in the research agenda.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis.Setting/SubjectsFood industry-supported projects related to human health were identified from food company websites; publications resulting from the food industry-sponsored projects were identified through a PubMed search.

Results: Of ten companies analysed, only two (Coca-Cola and the Mars Center for Cocoa Health Science) provided a list of research projects with sufficient detail for analysis. Among the 204 publications resulting from thirty-seven disclosed research projects, the most common topic was physical activity (40·7 %), while highly processed foods were analysed in 10·8 % of the publications. Twenty-two publications (10·8 %) focused on research integrity or research methods.

Conclusions: Publications resulting from Coca-Cola- and Mars-sponsored research appear to skew the evidence towards solutions that favour industry interests by focusing on food components that can be manipulated and marketed by food companies. These food industry-funded publications can also distract from nutrition as a health issue by diverting public and policy attention to physical activity. Shaping the debate around scientific methods can be another strategy that corporations use for their benefit to raise doubts about the methods used in non-industry sponsored research.

Keywords: Bias; Research agenda; Sponsorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of publications resulting from research projects related to human health funded by Coca-Cola and Mars, identified through a PubMed search, December 2016
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nestle M (2013) Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    1. Matos Serodio P, Stuckler D, Mckee M et al.. (2016) OP76 Corporate funding of scientific research: a case study of Coca-Cola. J Epidemiol Community Health 70, A42–A43.
    1. Nestle M (2016) Corporate funding of food and nutrition research: science or marketing? JAMA Intern Med 176, 13–14. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government (2015) National Innovation and Science Agenda Report. https://www.innovation.gov.au/page/national-innovation-and-science-agend... (accessed May 2018).
    1. Singh A & Singh S (2005) The connection between academia and industry. Mens Sana Monogr 3, 5–35. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources