Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 25;56(11):e01140-18.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01140-18. Print 2018 Nov.

Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates

Affiliations
Review

Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates

Pranita D Tamma et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The rapid spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms constitutes one of the greatest challenges to global health. While Gram-negative organisms have developed several mechanisms to avert the bactericidal effects of commonly prescribed antibiotic agents, the increasing prevalence of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) is particularly concerning given the rapid spread of mobile genetic elements containing carbapenemase genes, the limited treatment options for infections caused by these organisms, and the high mortality rates associated with CPO infections. Understanding if an organism is carbapenemase producing and, if so, the class of carbapenemase(s) produced has treatment implications, as some agents preferentially have activity against specific carbapenemases. Furthermore, CPO disseminate between patients with greater ease than non-CP-carbapenem-resistant organisms and warrant more intensive infection control measures than would be employed in the absence of carbapenemase production. Phenotypic assays currently used in clinical practice to detect CPO consist of the following: (i) growth-based assays which measure carbapenem resistance based on organism growth in the presence of a carbapenem antibiotic (e.g., modified Hodge test and modified carbapenem inactivation method), (ii) hydrolysis methods which detect carbapenem degradation products (e.g., Carba NP test and matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight mass spectrometry), and (iii) lateral flow immunoassays which detect carbapenemase enzymes through the use of specific antibodies. Although there is no single phenotypic test that meets all specifications of the ideal test, as we describe in this review, there are a number of tests that are user-friendly, affordable, accurate, and feasible for implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories of all sizes.

Keywords: Carba NP; Carba NP test; carbapenemase; carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae; carbapenemase-producing organism; lateral flow antigen; lateral flow assay; modified Hodge test; modified carbapenem inactivation method; phenotypic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
(A) Modified Hodge test. 1, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705, positive result; 2, K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1706, negative result; 3, clinical isolate, positive result. (B) CLSI Carba NP positive result. Tube A, no imipenem added, red; tube B, imipenem added, yellow. (C) Rapidec Carba NP (bioMérieux, Inc.) positive result. Well d, no imipenem added, red; well e, imipenem added, yellow. (D) Neo-Rapid Carba screen (Rosco Diagnostica) positive result. Tube 1a, no imipenem added, red; tube 1b, imipenem added, yellow (67). (E) Rapid Carb Blue Screen (Rosco Diagnostica) positive result. Tube a, no imipenem added, blue; tube b, imipenem added, yellow. (F) Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) positive result. (G) mCIM negative result. (H) mCIM and EDTA-mCIM (eCIM) results that are positive for a serine carbapenemase producer, as there is no inhibition of carbapenemase activity in the presence of EDTA. (I) mCIM and eCIM results that are positive for a metallo-beta-lactamase producer, as there is inhibition of carbapenemase activity in the presence of EDTA. (J) NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech) lateral flow immunoassay results for the different carbapenemases detected. Panel A is republished from reference with permission from the publisher. Panels B and F to I are republished from reference with permission from the publisher. The image from panel J was provided by NG Biotech.

References

    1. Logan LK, Weinstein RA. 2017. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis 215:S28–S36. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw282. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodman KE, Simner PJ, Tamma PD, Milstone AM. 2016. Infection control implications of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 14:95–108. doi:10.1586/14787210.2016.1106940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambler RP. 1980. The structure of beta-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 289:321–331. doi:10.1098/rstb.1980.0049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gniadek TJ, Carroll KC, Simner PJ. 2016. Carbapenem-resistant non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli: the missing piece to the puzzle. J Clin Microbiol 54:1700–1710. doi:10.1128/JCM.03264-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Logan LK, Bonomo RA. 2016. Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in United States children. Open Forum Infect Dis 3:ofw090. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw090. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources