Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Sep;50(9):1210-1211.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0213-x.

Genetic risks and clinical rewards

Affiliations
Comment

Genetic risks and clinical rewards

Andrew J Schork et al. Nat Genet. 2018 Sep.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conditional probability that an individual possesses a risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) at least 3 times as high as the average person (y-axis) given that the individual possesses a GPS score for atrial fibrillation (AFIB) in the percentiles reflected on the x axis. Left panel: the inset numbers give the strength of the genetic correlation between CAD and AFIB. The vertical dashed line is the percentile of the AFIB GPS distribution associated with a 3-fold a greater risk for AFIB. Right panel: same as the left panel except a third disease, type II diabetes (T2D), is included in the calculations in which it is assumed that T2D has genetic correlations of 0.2 and 0.1 with CAD and AFIB, respectively, and that the GPS percentile for T2D for the individual is the same for AFIB (as given on the x-axis). Note that the shift in the curves in right panel simply reflects the information about CAD risk provided by information about risk of diabetes even though it has weak assumed genetic correlations with CAD and AFIB. All calculations assumed multivariate normality of GPS values. The R package ‘condMVNorm’ was used to compute relevant conditional probabilities.(11)

Comment on

References

    1. Marigorta UM, Rodriguez JA, Gibson G, Navarro A. Replicability and Prediction: Lessons and Challenges from GWAS. Trends Genet. 2018;34(7):504–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Q, Flanders WD, Moonesinghe R, Ioannidis JP, Guessous I, Khoury MJ. Using lifetime risk estimates in personal genomic profiles: estimation of uncertainty. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(6):786–800. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel CJ, Sivadas A, Tabassum R, Preeprem T, Zhao J, Arafat D, Chen R, Morgan AA, Martin GS, Brigham KL, Butte AJ, Gibson G. Whole genome sequencing in support of wellness and health maintenance. Genome Med. 2013;5(6):58. doi: 10.1186/gm462. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schork NJ. Genetic parts to a preventive medicine whole. Genome Med. 2013;5(6):54. doi: 10.1186/gm458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(6):524–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011893. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources