A Prospective Case-control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
- PMID: 30158812
- PMCID: PMC6094537
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17
A Prospective Case-control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
Abstract
Background: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo transfer (ET).
Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atosiban (study group) in ET patients in comparison to placebo (control group) regarding implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate and to assess the safety profile of atosiban.
Materials and methods: A total of 320 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-ET at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in the study. In the study group, atosiban was given as initial intravenous (IV) bolus injection 0.9 ml (6.75 mg), 30 min before ET followed by continuous IV infusion of atosiban. In the control group, placebo (normal saline) was infused at the same rate and dose. Pregnancy was confirmed 14 days after ET by β-human chronic gonadotropin level. IR and CPR were determined by doing transvaginal sonography 3 weeks and 6 weeks postET, respectively.
Results: In women with atosiban treatment, the positive pregnancy rate and CPRs were 41.25% and 36.25%, respectively. The IR per embryo transferred was 17.5%. No major side effects of atosiban were noted among enlisted patients. The miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were low (12.12% and 4.54%, respectively). Forty-two women had singleton gestation, while twin and triplet pregnancies were encountered in 13 and 3 women, respectively. No congenital anomalies were observed during an antenatal scan at 18-20 weeks in ongoing pregnancies. The positive pregnancy rate, the CPR, and the IR in the control group was 35%, 30%, and 16.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the atosiban group.
Conclusion: Atosiban reduces uterine contractions and increases endomyometrial perfusion, both of which have potential benefits regarding improved IRs, CPR, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Atosiban has a good embryonic safety profile.
Keywords: Atosiban; clinical pregnancy rate; embryo transfer; implantation rate; placebo; positive pregnancy rate.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients undergoing IVF treatment.Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2687-94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu263. Epub 2014 Oct 21. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25336707 Clinical Trial.
-
Atosiban improves implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with repeated implantation failure.Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Sep;25(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jun 16. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012. PMID: 22818095
-
A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Aug 19;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 35986323 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Oxytocin and vasopressin V(1A) receptors as new therapeutic targets in assisted reproduction.Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Jan;22(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011. PMID: 21130036 Review.
-
Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer can improve in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Fertil Steril. 2019 Jul;112(1):89-97.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.027. Fertil Steril. 2019. PMID: 31277770 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of atosiban combined with ritodrine in the treatment of threatened preterm labor and related risk factors of different pregnancy outcomes.Am J Transl Res. 2022 Aug 15;14(8):5931-5940. eCollection 2022. Am J Transl Res. 2022. PMID: 36105038 Free PMC article.
-
Atosiban application in fresh ET cycle is effective for women undergoing repeated embryo implantation failures, especially for advanced-age obese patients.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):23044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49773-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38155160 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of diazepam administration during embryo transfer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study on reproductive outcomes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2379-2383. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03206-6. Epub 2024 Aug 31. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39215792
-
The effect of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes in different FET cycles: a single-center matched retrospective cohort study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 24;16:1547694. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1547694. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40630094 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of atosiban for repeated embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 23;14:1161707. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1161707. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37033236 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD, et al. Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: A systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:27–36. - PubMed
-
- Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3036–43. - PubMed
-
- Chou PY, Wu MH, Pan HA, Hung KH, Chang FM. Use of an oxytocin antagonist in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer for women with repeated implantation failure: A retrospective study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50:136–40. - PubMed
-
- Steinwall M, Hansson S, Bossmar T, Larsson I, Pilka R, Akerlund M, et al. Oxytocin mRNA content in the endometrium of non-pregnant women. BJOG. 2004;111:266–70. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical