One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer
- PMID: 30158813
- PMCID: PMC6094541
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_117_17
One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to compare cumulative in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes following two elective single embryo transfer (eSET) versus one double embryo transfer (DET) using blastocyst(s).
Settings and design: This was retrospective observational study.
Study period: The study was conducted during January 2015-December 2015.
Subjects and methods: Forty-one fresh + 25 frozen eSET versus 123 DET using self-oocytes and 68 fresh + 35 frozen eSET versus 184 DET using donor-oocytes were included in the study. All failing to achieve live birth after first eSET underwent frozen embryo transfer cycle with second blastocyst. Cumulative outcome after two eSET were compared with one DET.
Statistical analysis used: The analysis was performed by Chi-square and t-test.
Results: In self-oocytes group, higher but statistically nonsignificant cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (58.5% vs. 57.7%, P = 0.92) and live birth rate (LBR) (48.7% vs. 44.7%, P = 0.65) with significantly lower multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) (4.2% vs. 45%, P = 0.0002) were obtained; whereas in donor-oocytes group, comparable cumulative CPR (73.5% vs. 65.7%, P = 0.24), significantly higher LBR (64.7% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.02) and significantly lower MPR (4% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.00005) were obtained after two eSET vs. one DET. In self-oocytes group, the incidence of prematurity (10% vs. 21.4%, P > 0.05) and low birth weight (25% vs. 45.6%, P > 0.05) were lower but statistically nonsignificant, whereas in donor-oocytes group, incidence of prematurity was lower but statistically nonsignificant (26.7% vs. 38.8%, P > 0.05) while of low birth weight was significantly lower (32.7% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.0038) after two eSET versus one DET.
Conclusion: Cumulative LBR was higher with lower incidence of multiple births, prematurity and low birth weight after two eSET versus one DET using self- or donor-oocytes. Higher use of eSET improves reproductive outcomes in patients with good prognosis.
Keywords: Blastocyst; donor-oocyte; elective single embryo transfer; live birth rate; multiple pregnancy rate; prematurity.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Apr;32(4):363-377. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34482-6. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010. PMID: 20500945
-
Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):548-559. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.015. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35058041
-
Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1632-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep042. Epub 2009 Mar 24. Hum Reprod. 2009. PMID: 19318704
-
Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 3;24(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06537-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38702596 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Two Consecutive Cycles of Single Embryo Transfer Compared With One Cycle of Double Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 30;13:920973. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.920973. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35846284 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Perception of Key Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) by Providers and Clients in Nigeria.Int J Womens Health. 2021 Nov 3;13:1033-1052. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S331917. eCollection 2021. Int J Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34764702 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of post-vitrification cryopreservation duration on singleton birth-weight in frozen-thawed blastocysts transfer cycles.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 30;15:1366360. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1366360. eCollection 2024. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38745950 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and cost analysis of single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer.Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231206312. doi: 10.1177/17455057231206312. Womens Health (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37899602 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 27;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00899-1. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 35086551 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Twin Deliveries as Compared to Singleton Deliveries following In vitro Fertilization.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):56-64. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_105_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020. PMID: 32577070 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: An ASRM practice committee guideline. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1301–8. - PubMed
-
- Young BC, Wylie BJ. Effects of twin gestation on maternal morbidity. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:162–8. - PubMed
-
- Walker MC, Murphy KE, Pan S, Yang Q, Wen SW. Adverse maternal outcomes in multifetal pregnancies. BJOG. 2004;111:1294–6. - PubMed
-
- Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, Walker M. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9:429–35. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources