Illness Cognitions, Anxiety, and Depression in Men and Women Undergoing Fertility Treatments: A Dyadic Approach
- PMID: 30158816
- PMCID: PMC6094532
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17
Illness Cognitions, Anxiety, and Depression in Men and Women Undergoing Fertility Treatments: A Dyadic Approach
Abstract
Background: Emotional response to infertility is mediated by numerous interrelated psychological variables such as personality, health perceptions, cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support. While men and women respond to infertility differently, illness cognitions are a vital component of their emotional adjustment. The aim of this study is to compare the infertile men and women undergoing fertility treatments on perceived distress, helplessness, acceptance, benefits, anxiety, and depression.
Materials and methods: Eighty-one infertile couples, undergoing intrauterine insemination participated in the study. They were assessed on the presence of infertility distress using the fertility problem inventory, for psychiatric morbidity using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, for affective disturbances using the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales, and for illness cognitions using the Illness Cognition Questionnaire.
Statistical analysis: Data are analyzed using SPSS version 15. The paired sample t-test is performed for assessing differences on normally distributed data. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test is performed for assessing differences in medians obtained on data that was skewed.
Results and discussion: Infertile women (wives) were more emotionally distressed, anxious, and depressed than men (husbands). Gender-wise differences were found for perceptions of helplessness and acceptance of infertility. Infertility was perceived to be a nonbeneficial event for both partners investigated.
Conclusion: Negative cognitions and affective disturbances may contribute to higher treatment burden in couples seeking-assisted conception. The present study suggests that psychosocial intervention for couples plays a central role and should be integrated within the conventional treatments for infertility.
Keywords: Anxiety; Infertility specific stress; appraisal; assisted conception; burden; cognition; couple; depression; men; treatments; women.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Are patients at risk for psychological maladjustment during fertility treatment less willing to comply with treatment? Results from the Portuguese validation of the SCREENIVF.Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):293-302. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det418. Epub 2013 Nov 27. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 24287818
-
The effect of expressive writing intervention for infertile couples: a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):391-402. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew320. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28007790 Clinical Trial.
-
Emotional disorders, marital adaptation and the moderating role of social support for couples under treatment for infertility.Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(2):98-104. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0173. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Ginekol Pol. 2021. PMID: 33448003
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
Stress and Anxiety Levels in Couples who Undergo Fertility Treatment: a Review of Systematic Reviews.Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):60-64. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.60-64. Mater Sociomed. 2021. PMID: 34012353 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and predictive factors for infertility-related stress among infertile couples: A cross-sectional study from Jordan and the occupied Palestinian territories.Saudi Med J. 2022 Oct;43(10):1149-1156. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.10.20220411. Saudi Med J. 2022. PMID: 36261208 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of adjustment disorder and predisposing factors in infertile women.BMC Psychol. 2023 May 2;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01193-4. BMC Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37131228 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in psychological status of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):2131. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23314-x. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40483394 Free PMC article.
-
Expectations for family building, assisted reproduction, and adoption among lesbians in the National Survey of Family Growth, 2017-2019.F S Rep. 2023 Apr 13;4(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 Jun. F S Rep. 2023. PMID: 37398611 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Aug 23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32866858 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1967.
-
- Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The Common-Sense Representation of Illness Danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Contributions to Medical Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Pergamon Press; 1980. pp. 7–30.
-
- Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Contrada RJ. Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychol Health. 1998;13:717–33.
-
- Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:143–63.
-
- Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources