Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;7(3):211-218.
doi: 10.21037/tp.2018.03.02.

Chromosomal instability in first trimester miscarriage: a common cause of pregnancy loss?

Affiliations

Chromosomal instability in first trimester miscarriage: a common cause of pregnancy loss?

Philip John Hardy et al. Transl Pediatr. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: First trimester miscarriage without underlying medical conditions is most commonly caused by chromosomal abnormalities reported to occur in 50% or more of cases. These chromosomal changes in early losses include both numerical abnormalities and structural alterations that result in gain and/or loss of genetic information. Structural alterations are much less common than numerical changes. Jumping translocations (JTs) are considered extremely rare with only four cases previously reported.

Methods: We report 12 examples of chromosome instability seen in the fetal material of spontaneous first trimester miscarriages in a single study population.

Results: In these examples, we observed different cell lines with related chromosomal alterations. Some may be considered to be JT, where a single donor site was observed with different recipients. Others involved more than one site on the "donor" chromosome. One reported miscarriage involved multiple aneuploidy. All alterations resulted in partial trisomies and monosomies which predisposed the pregnancy to chromosomal imbalance and subsequent demise. Patient demographic data did not indicate possible causes of the errors observed.

Conclusions: This is the first report of such a large cohort and is believed to be the result of increased knowledge and depth of analysis in this area, rather than a representation of confounding factors in this population. It is therefore proposed that identifying these chromosomal changes must be incorporated into the system of testing within the clinical environment. We must also recognize that some routine laboratory techniques will fail to detect such genetic changes.

Keywords: Chromosomal instability (CIN); chromosomes; jumping translocations (JTs); miscarriage; structural alterations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptus 6: mos46,XX,del(5)(p15.1)[12]/46,XX,del(5)(p11.2)[6]. Mosaicism for two cell lines with different deletions of chromosome 5. One cell line exhibited a deletion of the terminal region of 5p with a breakpoint at 5p15.1. The deletion of 5p in the second cell line was much larger with a breakpoint at p11.2, therefore losing most of the short arm. Larger figure represents a full karyotype with the smaller deleted 5p. Note random loss of 14 in the karyotyped cell. Inset: a partial karyotype to demonstrate the different deletions observed in the sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptus 9: mos46,XY,inv dup(4)(p16.3p14)[22]/46,XY,der(4)t(3;4)(p21.3;p16.3)[12]/46,XY[36]. Mosaicism for a normal male cell line and two different alterations to chromosome 4p. The larger abnormal clone exhibited an inverted duplication of approximately half the short arm. The smaller clone exhibited a derivative 4 from an unbalanced translocation of approximately half the short arm of chromosome 3 and the distal region of chromosome 4p. There were two normal copies of chromosome 3 in every cell in this clone. Larger figure: full karyotype of the larger abnormal clone. Inset: partial karyotype demonstrating a normal 4, the inverted duplicated 4p and the derivative 4 from the 3;4 translocation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Geigl JB, Obenauf AC, Schwarzbraun T, et al. Defining “chromosomal instability’. Trends Genet 2008;24:64-9. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M. editors. ISCN 2016: An international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature. Kargar Basel 2016:90.
    1. Anderhub SJ, Krämer A, Maier B. Centrosome amplification in tumorigenesis. Cancer Letters 2012;322:8-17. 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michor F, Iwasa Y, Vogelstein B, et al. Can chromosomal instability initiate tumorigenesis? Semin Cancer Biol 2005;15:43-9. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woychik RP, Generoso WM, Russell LB, et al. Molecular and genetic characterization of a radiation-induced structural rearrangement in mouse chromosome 2 causing mutations at the limb deformity and agouti loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1990;87:2588-92. 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2588 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources